GSTDTAP  > 地球科学
Misrepresentation comes at a cost for union official
admin
2018-10-16
发布年2018
语种英语
国家澳大利亚
领域地球科学
正文(英文)

The CFMMEU’s former South Australian organiser has been fined for unlawfully misrepresenting his right to access a project site.

Mark Gava was penalised $6,000 and his union $68,000 following Mr Gava breaching right of entry laws at the Flinders Medical Centre project in Adelaide in December 2016.

In imposing the penalty the Federal Court found Mr Gava unlawfully misrepresented his right to access the project site and meet with workers while not having a valid right of entry permit.

Justice White in his judgment stated:

“Mr Gava is an experienced organiser who has held an entry permit for many years. He was not a person who was new to the job in which case inexperience may have been a mitigating factor. Mr Gava set out to mislead Hansen Yunken.”

“… Mr Gava knew that his entry permit had expired but was willing to see if he could get away with unauthorised entry. In order to do so, he was prepared, dishonestly, to misrepresent the position to Yuncken. In the events which happened, he did not “get away with it” and when challenged, he chose to lie.”

“Neither Mr Gava nor the CFMMEU has made any expression of regret or contrition.
Nor has the CFMMEU provided the Court with any evidence of steps it has taken with the view to ensuring that neither it nor its officials contravene s 503 again.”

“The CFMMEU’s record of contraventions of industrial legislation is appalling. Since 2000, it has been found to have contravened industrial legislation on more than 140 separate occasions;…”

“On any view, this is a deplorable record of contraventions. It must be taken into account in assessing penalties in the present case.”

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner Stephen McBurney said the breach was yet another example of a CFMMEU official dishonestly and deliberately engaging in unlawful conduct.

“Having a valid right of entry permit provides the holder with the right to enter a worksite for legitimate purposes. Mr Gava was prepared to claim that he had that right, even though he knew his permit had expired,” Mr McBurney said.

“Mr Gava chose to ignore the law and as a consequence he, and the CFMMEU, have been ordered to pay significant penalties to the Commonwealth.”

The penalties in this case increase the total penalties imposed on the CFMMEU and its officials to $810,190 this financial year.

These cases highlight why it is crucial the ABCC remains in place to ensure building and construction industry participants’ compliance with Australia’s workplace laws.

As a consistent supporter of the ABCC since it was first recommended by the Cole Royal Commission in 2003, AMMA recently provided input into a review of the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 (BCIIP Act), reiterating industry’s support for the regulator’s retention.

Further, AMMA continues to support the passage of the “Ensuring Integrity Bill“, which contains various measures seeking to lift the standards, behaviours and transparency of all registered organisations including trade unions and registered employer groups.

For more information contact [email protected] 

URL查看原文
来源平台Australian Resources & Energy Group
文献类型新闻
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/108326
专题地球科学
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
admin. Misrepresentation comes at a cost for union official. 2018.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[admin]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[admin]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[admin]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。