Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.3354/cr01534 |
Comparisons of observational data sets for evaluating the CMIP5 precipitation extreme simulations over Asia | |
Dong, Siyan1; Sun, Ying1,2 | |
2018 | |
发表期刊 | CLIMATE RESEARCH
![]() |
ISSN | 0936-577X |
EISSN | 1616-1572 |
出版年 | 2018 |
卷号 | 76期号:2页码:161-176 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Peoples R China |
英文摘要 | The accurate simulation of precipitation extremes in climate models is important for the understanding of future climate change and its impacts. Due to the poor coverage and the lack of uniformity of observational precipitation extreme data in Asia, it is difficult to evaluate whether existing climate models can accurately reproduce the patterns of and changes in precipitation extremes. The present study presents a comparison between 3 observational data sets and CMIP5 models and shows that improving the data coverage in the future is of great significance for understanding precipitation extreme changes in Asia. The 3 observational data sets show good consistency with the models in the mid- and high-latitude regions of Asia, where the data generally have good coverage. Meanwhile, the differences between the observations are obvious in the low-latitude region, and the differences between the models are also large. Although these discrepancies may be related to different operational orders and interpolation methods, the spatial coverage of data can constitute an important factor leading to such differences at low latitudes. The results for the mid-latitude region show little change in the new Asian observation data set (ADEX) compared with in HadEX2, but the trend of precipitation extreme intensity indices in ADEX are closer to the simulated trend than in HadEX2 for the high-latitude region. Furthermore, the differences in the intensity indices between the observations and models are larger than those in the frequency indices, indicating that the simulated and projected values of the intensity indices are higher than those of the frequency indices. In summary, there are differences between the 3 datasets and CMIP5 models, especially for low-latitudes and the intensity indices. |
英文关键词 | Precipitation extremes Observational data sets CMIP5 Model evaluation |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000449162700005 |
WOS关键词 | TEMPERATURE EXTREMES ; CLIMATE EXTREMES ; MODEL EVALUATION ; INDEXES ; 20TH-CENTURY ; AUSTRALIA ; NETWORK ; AFRICA ; TRENDS ; CHINA |
WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/15240 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
作者单位 | 1.China Meteorol Adm, Lab Climate Studies, Natl Climate Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China; 2.Joint Ctr Global Change Studies, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Dong, Siyan,Sun, Ying. Comparisons of observational data sets for evaluating the CMIP5 precipitation extreme simulations over Asia[J]. CLIMATE RESEARCH,2018,76(2):161-176. |
APA | Dong, Siyan,&Sun, Ying.(2018).Comparisons of observational data sets for evaluating the CMIP5 precipitation extreme simulations over Asia.CLIMATE RESEARCH,76(2),161-176. |
MLA | Dong, Siyan,et al."Comparisons of observational data sets for evaluating the CMIP5 precipitation extreme simulations over Asia".CLIMATE RESEARCH 76.2(2018):161-176. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
查看访问统计 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Dong, Siyan]的文章 |
[Sun, Ying]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Dong, Siyan]的文章 |
[Sun, Ying]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Dong, Siyan]的文章 |
[Sun, Ying]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论