Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.028 |
Rural Household Energy Use and Its Determinants in China: How Important Are Influences of Payment for Ecosystem Services vs. Other Factors? | |
Song, Conghe1; Bilsborrow, Richard1,3,4; Jagger, Pamela2,3; Zhang, Qi1; Chen, Xiaodong1; Huang, Qingfeng5 | |
2018-03-01 | |
发表期刊 | ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
![]() |
ISSN | 0921-8009 |
EISSN | 1873-6106 |
出版年 | 2018 |
卷号 | 145页码:148-159 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | USA; Peoples R China |
英文摘要 | Fuelwood is an essential environmental good for livelihood in rural China. Heavy reliance on fuelwood is associated with numerous negative externalities. Due to decades of rapid economic growth in China, we hypothesize that the increase in rural household income would reduce reliance on fuelwood. Using data from a survey of 481 households conducted in 2014, we examined the effects of two payments for ecosystem services programs, the Conversion of Cropland to Forest Program (CCFP) and the Ecological Welfare Forest Program (EWFP), on energy use, along with other factors. We found that the CCFP did not significantly affect fuel choice nor the quantity of fuelwood used, but households with more forestland in EWFP were less likely to adopt modern fuels and likely to use more fuelwood. Household per capita annual income was the main factor promoting adoption of modem fuels, while household size was the most important factor determining the quantity of fuelwood used per capita. Overall, the gradually increasing adoption of modern fuels has thus far not resulted in any significant abandonment of fuelwood. Fuelwood remains the dominant fuel across all income groups, suggesting that households in the study area are in the early stages of the energy transition. |
英文关键词 | Conversion of Cropland to Forest Program (CCFP) Ecological Welfare Forest Program (EWFP) Fuelwood Energy ladder Fuel stacking Household income China |
领域 | 资源环境 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000424316700014 |
WOS关键词 | JIANGXI PROVINCE ; FOREST COVER ; SOUTH-AFRICA ; FUELWOOD USE ; CONSUMPTION ; POVERTY ; LADDER ; TRANSITION ; FUELS ; DEFORESTATION |
WOS类目 | Ecology ; Economics ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Business & Economics |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/15828 |
专题 | 资源环境科学 |
作者单位 | 1.Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Geog, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA; 2.Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Publ Policy Curriculum Environm & Ecol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA; 3.Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Carolina Populat Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA; 4.Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Geog & Curriculum Environm & Ecol, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA; 5.Anhui Agr Univ, Sch Forestry & Landscape Architecture, Hefei 230036, Anhui, Peoples R China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Song, Conghe,Bilsborrow, Richard,Jagger, Pamela,et al. Rural Household Energy Use and Its Determinants in China: How Important Are Influences of Payment for Ecosystem Services vs. Other Factors?[J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,2018,145:148-159. |
APA | Song, Conghe,Bilsborrow, Richard,Jagger, Pamela,Zhang, Qi,Chen, Xiaodong,&Huang, Qingfeng.(2018).Rural Household Energy Use and Its Determinants in China: How Important Are Influences of Payment for Ecosystem Services vs. Other Factors?.ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,145,148-159. |
MLA | Song, Conghe,et al."Rural Household Energy Use and Its Determinants in China: How Important Are Influences of Payment for Ecosystem Services vs. Other Factors?".ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS 145(2018):148-159. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论