Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.005 |
Differential Impacts of Conservation Agriculture Technology Options on Household Income in Sub-Saharan Africa | |
Tambo, Justice A.1,2; Mockshell, Jonathan3,4 | |
2018-09-01 | |
发表期刊 | ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
![]() |
ISSN | 0921-8009 |
EISSN | 1873-6106 |
出版年 | 2018 |
卷号 | 151页码:95-105 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Switzerland; Germany; Colombia |
英文摘要 | Conservation agriculture (CA), which consists of minimum soil disturbance, crop residue retention and crop rotation, is claimed to generate a number of agronomic, economic and environmental benefits. Recognising these potential benefits, CA is widely promoted in efforts towards sustainable agricultural intensification. However, there has been an intense debate about its suitability in smallholder farming environments, and this has stimulated a growing interest in the adoption and impacts of CA technologies in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Using survey data from maize-growing households in nine SSA countries, this paper seeks to add to the extant literature by examining the drivers and welfare impacts of individual and combined implementation of the three components of CA. We employ inverse-probability-weighting regression-adjustment and propensity score matching with multiple treatment estimators. Overall, results show that adoption of a CA technology significantly increases total household income and income per adult equivalent. Disaggregating the CA components, we find that adoption of the components in combination is associated with larger income gains than when the components are adopted in isolation, and the largest effect is achieved when households implement the three practices jointly. Nevertheless, implementation of the full CA package among the sampled households is very low, with an average adoption rate of 8%. We identify key factors that might spur increased adoption, including education, secure land rights, and access to institutional support services. Results further show that the determinants and impacts of the CA components vary considerably among the study countries, suggesting location specificity of CA. Our results are consistent across alternative estimators. |
英文关键词 | Conservation Agriculture Sustainable Intensification Technology Adoption Household Income Sub-Saharan Africa |
领域 | 资源环境 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000437078900010 |
WOS关键词 | SMALLHOLDER FARMERS ; MINIMUM TILLAGE ; ADOPTION ; ZAMBIA ; SECURITY ; ETHIOPIA ; LABOR |
WOS类目 | Ecology ; Economics ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Business & Economics |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/15994 |
专题 | 资源环境科学 |
作者单位 | 1.CABI, Rue Grillons 1, CH-2800 Delemont, Switzerland; 2.Univ Bonn, Ctr Dev Res ZEF, Genscherallee 3, D-53113 Bonn, Germany; 3.CIAT, Apartado Aereo 6713, Cali, Colombia; 4.German Dev Inst DIE, Tulpenfeld 6, D-53113 Bonn, Germany |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Tambo, Justice A.,Mockshell, Jonathan. Differential Impacts of Conservation Agriculture Technology Options on Household Income in Sub-Saharan Africa[J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,2018,151:95-105. |
APA | Tambo, Justice A.,&Mockshell, Jonathan.(2018).Differential Impacts of Conservation Agriculture Technology Options on Household Income in Sub-Saharan Africa.ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,151,95-105. |
MLA | Tambo, Justice A.,et al."Differential Impacts of Conservation Agriculture Technology Options on Household Income in Sub-Saharan Africa".ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS 151(2018):95-105. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论