Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.033 |
Navigating the "paradox of openness" in energy and transport innovation: Insights from eight corporate clean technology research and development case studies | |
Sovacool, Benjamin K.1,2; Jeppesen, Jakob1; Bandsholm, Jesper1; Asmussen, Joakim1; Balachandran, Rakulan1; Vestergaard, Simon1; Andersen, Thomas Hauerslev1; Sorensen, Thomas Klode1; Bjorn-Thygesen, Frans1 | |
2017-06-01 | |
发表期刊 | ENERGY POLICY
![]() |
ISSN | 0301-4215 |
EISSN | 1873-6777 |
出版年 | 2017 |
卷号 | 105 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Denmark; England |
英文摘要 | Using an inductive case study approach drawn from original interview data, this article investigates the innovation approaches among a sample of international energy companies, or corporate firms. It first presents a conceptual framework synthesized from the business studies, entrepreneurship, evolutionary economics, innovation studies, management science, organization studies, political science, and sociology literature. This framework suggests that corporate approaches to clean technology innovation will cut across the four dimensions of organizational multiplicity and stakeholder involvement, information sharing, coordination and control, and market orientation. It then explores how eight firms the Algal Carbon Conversion Flagship and Aurora Algae (biofuel), DONG and Statoil (carbon capture and storage), Tesla and Volkswagen (electric vehicles), and Siemens and Vestas (offshore wind turbines) approach clean technology development with "open innovation" attributes mixed with "closed" attributes. Although the study finds striking similarities among the particular approaches embraced by each corporate actor, it also notes that approaches are technology and firm specific, and the potential for different permutations leads to an almost endless number of possible stylistic combinations. The innovation profiles depicted also reveal conflict and competition among various stakeholders, the implication being that corporate innovation in the energy sector remains a conflicted, disjointed, and messy process. |
英文关键词 | Open innovation Corporate research style Energy systems Transport |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000400532900023 |
WOS关键词 | CARBON-DIOXIDE ; MICROALGAE ; SEARCH ; COOPERATION ; BOUNDARY ; SCIENCE ; MODEL ; COST |
WOS类目 | Economics ; Energy & Fuels ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies |
WOS研究方向 | Business & Economics ; Energy & Fuels ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/17701 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
作者单位 | 1.Aarhus Univ, Dept Business Dev & Technol, Birk Centerpk 15, DK-7400 Herning, Denmark; 2.Univ Sussex, Sch Business Management & Econ, SPRU, Brighton, E Sussex, England |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Sovacool, Benjamin K.,Jeppesen, Jakob,Bandsholm, Jesper,et al. Navigating the "paradox of openness" in energy and transport innovation: Insights from eight corporate clean technology research and development case studies[J]. ENERGY POLICY,2017,105. |
APA | Sovacool, Benjamin K..,Jeppesen, Jakob.,Bandsholm, Jesper.,Asmussen, Joakim.,Balachandran, Rakulan.,...&Bjorn-Thygesen, Frans.(2017).Navigating the "paradox of openness" in energy and transport innovation: Insights from eight corporate clean technology research and development case studies.ENERGY POLICY,105. |
MLA | Sovacool, Benjamin K.,et al."Navigating the "paradox of openness" in energy and transport innovation: Insights from eight corporate clean technology research and development case studies".ENERGY POLICY 105(2017). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论