GSTDTAP  > 气候变化
DOI10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.033
Navigating the "paradox of openness" in energy and transport innovation: Insights from eight corporate clean technology research and development case studies
Sovacool, Benjamin K.1,2; Jeppesen, Jakob1; Bandsholm, Jesper1; Asmussen, Joakim1; Balachandran, Rakulan1; Vestergaard, Simon1; Andersen, Thomas Hauerslev1; Sorensen, Thomas Klode1; Bjorn-Thygesen, Frans1
2017-06-01
发表期刊ENERGY POLICY
ISSN0301-4215
EISSN1873-6777
出版年2017
卷号105
文章类型Article
语种英语
国家Denmark; England
英文摘要

Using an inductive case study approach drawn from original interview data, this article investigates the innovation approaches among a sample of international energy companies, or corporate firms. It first presents a conceptual framework synthesized from the business studies, entrepreneurship, evolutionary economics, innovation studies, management science, organization studies, political science, and sociology literature. This framework suggests that corporate approaches to clean technology innovation will cut across the four dimensions of organizational multiplicity and stakeholder involvement, information sharing, coordination and control, and market orientation. It then explores how eight firms the Algal Carbon Conversion Flagship and Aurora Algae (biofuel), DONG and Statoil (carbon capture and storage), Tesla and Volkswagen (electric vehicles), and Siemens and Vestas (offshore wind turbines) approach clean technology development with "open innovation" attributes mixed with "closed" attributes. Although the study finds striking similarities among the particular approaches embraced by each corporate actor, it also notes that approaches are technology and firm specific, and the potential for different permutations leads to an almost endless number of possible stylistic combinations. The innovation profiles depicted also reveal conflict and competition among various stakeholders, the implication being that corporate innovation in the energy sector remains a conflicted, disjointed, and messy process.


英文关键词Open innovation Corporate research style Energy systems Transport
领域气候变化
收录类别SCI-E ; SSCI
WOS记录号WOS:000400532900023
WOS关键词CARBON-DIOXIDE ; MICROALGAE ; SEARCH ; COOPERATION ; BOUNDARY ; SCIENCE ; MODEL ; COST
WOS类目Economics ; Energy & Fuels ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies
WOS研究方向Business & Economics ; Energy & Fuels ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/17701
专题气候变化
作者单位1.Aarhus Univ, Dept Business Dev & Technol, Birk Centerpk 15, DK-7400 Herning, Denmark;
2.Univ Sussex, Sch Business Management & Econ, SPRU, Brighton, E Sussex, England
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Sovacool, Benjamin K.,Jeppesen, Jakob,Bandsholm, Jesper,et al. Navigating the "paradox of openness" in energy and transport innovation: Insights from eight corporate clean technology research and development case studies[J]. ENERGY POLICY,2017,105.
APA Sovacool, Benjamin K..,Jeppesen, Jakob.,Bandsholm, Jesper.,Asmussen, Joakim.,Balachandran, Rakulan.,...&Bjorn-Thygesen, Frans.(2017).Navigating the "paradox of openness" in energy and transport innovation: Insights from eight corporate clean technology research and development case studies.ENERGY POLICY,105.
MLA Sovacool, Benjamin K.,et al."Navigating the "paradox of openness" in energy and transport innovation: Insights from eight corporate clean technology research and development case studies".ENERGY POLICY 105(2017).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Sovacool, Benjamin K.]的文章
[Jeppesen, Jakob]的文章
[Bandsholm, Jesper]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Sovacool, Benjamin K.]的文章
[Jeppesen, Jakob]的文章
[Bandsholm, Jesper]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Sovacool, Benjamin K.]的文章
[Jeppesen, Jakob]的文章
[Bandsholm, Jesper]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。