Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.040 |
Energy justice and controversies: Formal and informal assessment in energy projects | |
Pesch, Udo; Correlje, Aad; Cuppen, Eefje; Taebi, Behnam | |
2017-10-01 | |
发表期刊 | ENERGY POLICY
![]() |
ISSN | 0301-4215 |
EISSN | 1873-6777 |
出版年 | 2017 |
卷号 | 109 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Netherlands |
英文摘要 | In this paper we develop a framework for understanding how justice-related claims play a role in the dynamics of controversy in energy projects. We do so by distinguishing two interacting trajectories of assessment: a formal trajectory that is embedded in the legal system and an informal trajectory that is mainly embedded in public discourse. The emergence of an informal assessment trajectory can be seen as a response to a (perceived) lack of attention to particular concerns or values in the formal trajectory, i.e. 'overflowing'. The emerging informal assessment may subsequently lead to adaptations in the formal trajectory, which we refer to as `backflowing'. Based on insights from case studies on Dutch energy projects and literature on energy justice we identify three justice-related attributes that facilitate understanding of the emergence of controversies. These attributes are based on differences between the two trajectories in terms of 1) the way in which values are expressed, 2) the dimension of energy justice that is taken as a starting point, and 3) the democratic legitimization of assessment trajectories. In order to allow for legitimate and effective energy policy, overflowing and backflowing need to be addressed as interrelated rather than as separate processes. |
英文关键词 | Energy justice Controversy Assessment trajectories Overflowing Dutch energy projects Legitimate decision-making |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000412034400079 |
WOS关键词 | ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ; SHALE GAS ; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE ; WIND ENERGY ; POLITICS ; NIMBY ; TECHNOLOGY ; FRAMEWORK ; CRITIQUE ; POWER |
WOS类目 | Economics ; Energy & Fuels ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies |
WOS研究方向 | Business & Economics ; Energy & Fuels ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/19203 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
作者单位 | Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Jafflaan 5, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Pesch, Udo,Correlje, Aad,Cuppen, Eefje,et al. Energy justice and controversies: Formal and informal assessment in energy projects[J]. ENERGY POLICY,2017,109. |
APA | Pesch, Udo,Correlje, Aad,Cuppen, Eefje,&Taebi, Behnam.(2017).Energy justice and controversies: Formal and informal assessment in energy projects.ENERGY POLICY,109. |
MLA | Pesch, Udo,et al."Energy justice and controversies: Formal and informal assessment in energy projects".ENERGY POLICY 109(2017). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论