Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.061 |
The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: A qualitative study of public perceptions towards energy technologies and portfolios in Germany | |
Scheer, Dirk1; Konrad, Wilfried2; Wassermann, Sandra1 | |
2017 | |
发表期刊 | ENERGY POLICY
![]() |
ISSN | 0301-4215 |
EISSN | 1873-6777 |
出版年 | 2017 |
卷号 | 100 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Germany |
英文摘要 | This paper investigates informed public preferences about electricity technologies and portfolios in Germany, qualitatively analyzing opinions, reasoning patterns and judgments of perceived risks and benefits among lay people. The authors developed and applied a 'mixed-method' focus group approach involving 130 participants in 15 focus groups throughout Germany. This research aimed to specify participants' attitudes and preferences regarding electricity technologies and portfolios (evaluation categories); comparatively assess these preferences (technology/portfolio acceptance profiles); and identify participants' decision-making strategies and processes (decision rule typology). The evaluation basis of people's preferences comprises nine evaluation categories including, among others, trust, national and household economics, and environmental and health impacts. When assessing preferences regarding electricity technologies and portfolios, two overriding results need to be emphasized: first, that selective evaluation patterns produce unique acceptance profiles, and second, that a shift occurs from heterogeneous towards homogeneous evaluation patterns. In relation to decision rules guiding people's preference-making, the research reveals multiple mechanisms are at work when people express preferences about electricity portfolios. Five decision rules were identified regarding how participants dealt with complex portfolio information processing and preference building. |
英文关键词 | Public preferences Informed decision Technology acceptance Electricity technologies and portfolios Qualitative analysis |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000391903900010 |
WOS关键词 | SOCIAL DESIRABILITY BIAS ; WIND ENERGY ; SOCIETAL ACCEPTANCE ; RENEWABLE ENERGIES ; RISK PERCEPTIONS ; CARBON CAPTURE ; NUCLEAR-POWER ; ATTITUDES ; STORAGE ; NIMBY |
WOS类目 | Economics ; Energy & Fuels ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies |
WOS研究方向 | Business & Economics ; Energy & Fuels ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/19285 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
作者单位 | 1.Univ Stuttgart, Stuttgart Res Ctr Interdisciplinary Risk & Innova, Seidenstr 36, D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany; 2.DIALOGIK Nonprofit Inst Commun & Cooperat Res, Lerchenstr 22, D-70176 Stuttgart, Germany |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Scheer, Dirk,Konrad, Wilfried,Wassermann, Sandra. The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: A qualitative study of public perceptions towards energy technologies and portfolios in Germany[J]. ENERGY POLICY,2017,100. |
APA | Scheer, Dirk,Konrad, Wilfried,&Wassermann, Sandra.(2017).The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: A qualitative study of public perceptions towards energy technologies and portfolios in Germany.ENERGY POLICY,100. |
MLA | Scheer, Dirk,et al."The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: A qualitative study of public perceptions towards energy technologies and portfolios in Germany".ENERGY POLICY 100(2017). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论