GSTDTAP  > 气候变化
DOI10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0590.1
Why Do Different Drought Indices Show Distinct Future Drought Risk Outcomes in the US Great Plains?
Feng, Song1; Trnka, Miroslav2,3; Hayes, Michael4; Zhang, Yongjun1
2017
发表期刊JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
ISSN0894-8755
EISSN1520-0442
出版年2017
卷号30期号:1
文章类型Article
语种英语
国家USA; Czech Republic
英文摘要

Vigorous discussions and disagreements about the future changes in drought intensity in the U.S. Great Plains have been taking place recently within the literature. These discussions have involved widely varying estimates based on drought indices and model-based projections of the future. To investigate and understand the causes for such a disparity between these previous estimates, the authors analyzed the soil moisture at the near-surface soil layer and the entire soil column, as well as the Palmer drought severity index, the Palmer Z index, and the standardized precipitation and evaporation index using the output from the Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4), and 25 state-of-the-art climate models. These drought indices were computed using potential evapotranspiration estimated by the physically based Penman-Monteith method (PE_pm) and the empirically based Thornthwaite method (PE_th). The results showed that the short-term drought indices are similar to modeled surface soil moisture and show a small but consistent drying trend in the future. The long-term drought indices and the total column soil moisture, however, are consistent in projecting more intense future drought. When normalized, the drought indices with PE_th all show unprecedented future drying, while the drought indices with PE_pm show comparable dryness with the modeled soil moisture. Additionally, the drought indices with PE_pm are closely related to soil moisture during both the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Overall, the drought indices with PE_pm, as well as the modeled total column soil moisture, suggest a widespread and very significant drying in the Great Plains toward the end of the century. The results suggest that the sharp contrasts about future drought risk in the Great Plains discussed in previous studies are caused by 1) comparing the projected changes in short-term droughts with that of the long-term droughts and/or 2) computing the atmospheric evaporative demand using an empirically based method (e.g., PE_th). The analysis here may be applied for drought projections in other regions across the globe.


领域气候变化
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000391855700016
WOS关键词EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ; ARIDITY ; CMIP5
WOS类目Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WOS研究方向Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/20507
专题气候变化
作者单位1.Univ Arkansas, Dept Geosci, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA;
2.AS CR, Vvi, Global Change Res Inst, Brno, Czech Republic;
3.Mendel Univ Brno, Inst Agr Syst & Bioclimatol, Brno, Czech Republic;
4.Univ Nebraska, Sch Nat Resources, Natl Drought Mitigat Ctr, Lincoln, NE USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Feng, Song,Trnka, Miroslav,Hayes, Michael,et al. Why Do Different Drought Indices Show Distinct Future Drought Risk Outcomes in the US Great Plains?[J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE,2017,30(1).
APA Feng, Song,Trnka, Miroslav,Hayes, Michael,&Zhang, Yongjun.(2017).Why Do Different Drought Indices Show Distinct Future Drought Risk Outcomes in the US Great Plains?.JOURNAL OF CLIMATE,30(1).
MLA Feng, Song,et al."Why Do Different Drought Indices Show Distinct Future Drought Risk Outcomes in the US Great Plains?".JOURNAL OF CLIMATE 30.1(2017).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Feng, Song]的文章
[Trnka, Miroslav]的文章
[Hayes, Michael]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Feng, Song]的文章
[Trnka, Miroslav]的文章
[Hayes, Michael]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Feng, Song]的文章
[Trnka, Miroslav]的文章
[Hayes, Michael]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。