Reply to comment by Anel on "Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?"

doi:10.1002/2017WR020480

GSTDTAP > 资源环境科学

DOI	10.1002/2017WR020480
	Reply to comment by Anel on "Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?"
	Hutton, Christopher 1,2; Wagener, Thorsten 1,3; Freer, Jim 3,4; Han, Dawei 1; Duffy, Chris 5; Arheimer, Berit 6
	2017-03-01
发表期刊	WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
ISSN	0043-1397
EISSN	1944-7973
出版年	2017
卷号	53 期号:3
文章类型	Editorial Material
语种	英语
国家	England; USA; Sweden
英文摘要	In this article, we reply to a comment made on our previous commentary regarding reproducibility in computational hydrology. Software licensing and version control of code are important technical aspects of making code and workflows of scientific experiments open and reproducible. However, in our view, it is the cultural change that is the greatest challenge to overcome to achieve reproducible scientific research in computational hydrology. We believe that from changing the culture and attitude among hydrological scientists, details will evolve to cover more (technical) aspects over time.
英文关键词	reproducibility hydrology code workflow hydrology
领域	资源环境
收录类别	SCI-E
WOS记录号	WOS:000400160500050
WOS类目	Environmental Sciences ; Limnology ; Water Resources
WOS研究方向	Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Marine & Freshwater Biology ; Water Resources
引用统计
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/21061
专题	资源环境科学
作者单位	1.Univ Bristol, Dept Civil Engn, Bristol, Avon, England; 2.Wessex Water, Bath, Avon, England; 3.Univ Bristol, Cabot Inst, Bristol, Avon, England; 4.Univ Bristol, Sch Geog Sci, Bristol, Avon, England; 5.Penn State Univ, Dept Civil Engn, State Coll, PA USA; 6.Swedish Meteorol & Hydrol Inst, Norrkoping, Sweden
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Hutton, Christopher,Wagener, Thorsten,Freer, Jim,et al. Reply to comment by Anel on "Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?"[J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH,2017,53(3).
APA	Hutton, Christopher,Wagener, Thorsten,Freer, Jim,Han, Dawei,Duffy, Chris,&Arheimer, Berit.(2017).Reply to comment by Anel on "Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?".WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH,53(3).
MLA	Hutton, Christopher,et al."Reply to comment by Anel on "Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?"".WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH 53.3(2017).