Comment on "Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?" by Christopher Hutton et al.

doi:10.1002/2016WR020208

GSTDTAP > 资源环境科学

DOI	10.1002/2016WR020208
	Comment on "Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?" by Christopher Hutton et al.
	Melsen, Lieke A.; Torfs, Paul J. J. F.; Uijlenhoet, Remko; Teuling, Adriaan J.
	2017-03-01
发表期刊	WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
ISSN	0043-1397
EISSN	1944-7973
出版年	2017
卷号	53 期号:3
文章类型	Editorial Material
语种	英语
国家	Netherlands
英文摘要	We discuss two definitions of reproducibility, and question if both definitions are required to be met in computational hydrological studies.
英文关键词	reproducibility repeatability computational hydrology
领域	资源环境
收录类别	SCI-E
WOS记录号	WOS:000400160500047
WOS关键词	MODELS
WOS类目	Environmental Sciences ; Limnology ; Water Resources
WOS研究方向	Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Marine & Freshwater Biology ; Water Resources
引用统计
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/21315
专题	资源环境科学
作者单位	Wageningen Univ, Hydrol & Quantitat Water Management Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Melsen, Lieke A.,Torfs, Paul J. J. F.,Uijlenhoet, Remko,et al. Comment on "Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?" by Christopher Hutton et al.[J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH,2017,53(3).
APA	Melsen, Lieke A.,Torfs, Paul J. J. F.,Uijlenhoet, Remko,&Teuling, Adriaan J..(2017).Comment on "Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?" by Christopher Hutton et al..WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH,53(3).
MLA	Melsen, Lieke A.,et al."Comment on "Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?" by Christopher Hutton et al.".WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH 53.3(2017).