GSTDTAP
DOI10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111013
The case for a tortoise approach to US nuclear research and development
Ford, Michael J.1,3; Schrag, Daniel P.1,2,3
2019-12-01
发表期刊ENERGY POLICY
ISSN0301-4215
EISSN1873-6777
出版年2019
卷号135
文章类型Article
语种英语
国家USA
英文摘要

The future role of nuclear power in decarbonization of the US electricity grid is uncertain. Large light water plants have proven challenging to deploy, and the existing nuclear fleet is under market pressure. A new cadre of developers, supported by the US Department of Energy, is pressing for an accelerated path to deployment of new nuclear designs to address the climate challenge and maintain the nuclear industrial base. However, an examination of market dynamics and the ongoing pace of low carbon technology transition portend significant challenges for these vendors. Our analysis indicates that the current advanced reactor research and development paradigm is unlikely to yield multiple technology options in a timeframe that matters and argues for a slower and steadier "tortoise" approach. Using an optimization model we demonstrate that a slower, structured approach across a broad portfolio of technologies will better align nuclear development with a possible mid-century market opening. By allowing additional development time, building multiple demonstration plants, and operating these new designs for extended periods, it is more likely that there will be competitive technologies that can meet the future economic and technical requirements for widespread nuclear deployment should the technology be required in decarbonization efforts.


英文关键词Advanced nuclear Nuclear energy research and development Technology transition Grid decarbonization
领域气候变化
收录类别SCI-E ; SSCI
WOS记录号WOS:000506465400035
WOS关键词REAL OPTIONS ; POWER
WOS类目Economics ; Energy & Fuels ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies
WOS研究方向Business & Economics ; Energy & Fuels ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/224573
专题环境与发展全球科技态势
作者单位1.Harvard Univ, Ctr Environm, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA;
2.Harvard Univ, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Sch Engn & Appl Sci, 20 Oxford St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA;
3.Harvard Kennedy Sch, Belfer Ctr Sci & Int Affairs, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Ford, Michael J.,Schrag, Daniel P.. The case for a tortoise approach to US nuclear research and development[J]. ENERGY POLICY,2019,135.
APA Ford, Michael J.,&Schrag, Daniel P..(2019).The case for a tortoise approach to US nuclear research and development.ENERGY POLICY,135.
MLA Ford, Michael J.,et al."The case for a tortoise approach to US nuclear research and development".ENERGY POLICY 135(2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Ford, Michael J.]的文章
[Schrag, Daniel P.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Ford, Michael J.]的文章
[Schrag, Daniel P.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Ford, Michael J.]的文章
[Schrag, Daniel P.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。