GSTDTAP  > 气候变化
DOI10.1016/j.foreco.2017.07.037
Do large carnivores use riparian zones? Ecological implications for forest management
Phoebus, Isobel1,2; Segelbacher, Gernot2; Stenhouse, Gordon B.1
2017-10-15
发表期刊FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
ISSN0378-1127
EISSN1872-7042
出版年2017
卷号402
文章类型Article
语种英语
国家Canada; Germany
英文摘要

As part of forest management guidelines, most North American jurisdictions require the preservation of forested areas adjacent to streams and rivers (i.e. riparian zones). Forested buffer strips with restrictions on timber harvest and road-building (i.e. riparian buffer zones) were originally implemented to protect aquatic functions and resources. Riparian buffer zones now also target terrestrial habitats and wildlife. Even so, forestry managers who implement guidelines seldom consider the value of riparian zones (RZs) for large carnivores, partly due to a lack of data available. In the present study, our objective was to understand the role of riparian zones and riparian buffer zones for large carnivores in managed boreal forests. We used nine years of GPS telemetry data (2007-2015) from radio collared grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in the Kakwa region of west-central Alberta, Canada to quantify both the use (i.e. the amount of time grizzly bears spend in RZs) and selection (i.e. use in relation to the available riparian habitat) of RZs. We examined the effects of season, sex, distance class (0-30 or 30-60 m from streams and rivers), and the surrounding forest (harvested versus non-harvested) on use and selection of RZs. We found grizzly bears spent 19.1% of their time within 60 meters from streams and rivers. Selection of RZs declined relative to the distance from streams and rivers (10.8% within 0-30 m and 8.4% within 30-60 m). During summer, grizzly bears selected RZs in harvested areas and avoided them in non-harvested areas. There was no difference in selection of RZs in harvested areas between males and females; however, in non-harvested areas, females avoided RZs and selected RZs less compared to males. These results, particularly the selection of RZs in harvested areas where RZs consist mostly of riparian buffer zones, suggest that riparian buffers provide valuable grizzly bear habitat in multiple-use landscapes. Forest management practices can support grizzly bear habitat conservation efforts by implementing riparian buffer zones in identified grizzly bear habitat and considering grizzly bear habitat use of RZs and riparian buffers as one component of riparian zone management.


英文关键词Boreal forest Forestry guidelines Riparian buffer Habitat selection Grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) Alberta Canada
领域气候变化
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000411534000015
WOS关键词WEST-CENTRAL ALBERTA ; BEAR HABITAT SELECTION ; GRIZZLY BEARS ; COLLAR PERFORMANCE ; URSUS-ARCTOS ; HOME-RANGE ; LANDSCAPE ; CANADA ; DISTURBANCE ; CLEARCUTS
WOS类目Forestry
WOS研究方向Forestry
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/23134
专题气候变化
作者单位1.fRI Res Grizzly Bear Program, 1176 Switzer Dr, Hinton, AB T7V 1V3, Canada;
2.Univ Freiburg, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Management, Tennenbacher Str 4, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Phoebus, Isobel,Segelbacher, Gernot,Stenhouse, Gordon B.. Do large carnivores use riparian zones? Ecological implications for forest management[J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT,2017,402.
APA Phoebus, Isobel,Segelbacher, Gernot,&Stenhouse, Gordon B..(2017).Do large carnivores use riparian zones? Ecological implications for forest management.FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT,402.
MLA Phoebus, Isobel,et al."Do large carnivores use riparian zones? Ecological implications for forest management".FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT 402(2017).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Phoebus, Isobel]的文章
[Segelbacher, Gernot]的文章
[Stenhouse, Gordon B.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Phoebus, Isobel]的文章
[Segelbacher, Gernot]的文章
[Stenhouse, Gordon B.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Phoebus, Isobel]的文章
[Segelbacher, Gernot]的文章
[Stenhouse, Gordon B.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。