Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
The Case for Cash | |
[unavailable] | |
2017-03-01 | |
出版年 | 2017 |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | 国际 |
领域 | 气候变化 |
英文摘要 |
![]() Cash does not fuel crime, any more than condoms fuel lust. Cash is an extremely useful social contrivance. Two possible drawbacks of high-denomination cash have recently been discussed by Kenneth Rogoff in his book The Curse of Cash, and echoed by other economists. They are the extensive use of high-denomination cash by criminals and others engaged in illicit and corrupt activities, and the role that cash plays in avoiding deeply negative nominal interest rates imposed on bank accounts. Rogoff and others call for a phaseout of high-denomination cash over a long time. The use of cash in crime, I argue, is preferable to the alternative, and there are limits to the benefits of deeply negative nominal interest rates. There are no adequate alternatives to cash for poor and unbanked people. Consequently, the current high-denomination cash in the United States should be retained. WORKING PAPER NO: 679 |
URL | 查看原文 |
来源平台 | Asian Development Bank |
文献类型 | 科技报告 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/233902 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | [unavailable]. The Case for Cash,2017. |
条目包含的文件 | 下载所有文件 | |||||
文件名称/大小 | 文献类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
adbi-wp679.pdf(352KB) | 科技报告 | 开放获取 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 下载 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
查看访问统计 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[[unavailable]]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[[unavailable]]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[[unavailable]]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论