Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
Responses to Trade Opening: Evidence and Lessons from Asia | |
[unavailable] | |
2019-01-11 | |
出版年 | 2019 |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | 国际 |
领域 | 气候变化 |
英文摘要 |
![]() Over the last three decades, many developing countries have liberalized their trade regimes. In various Asian countries, international trade has raised productivity, lowered markups through import competition (while increasing them through cheaper inputs that can be imported), raised wages, expanded employment, and, above all, reduced poverty. This is in sharp contrast to the impact of trade in some of the Latin American countries, which suggests exercising caution in extrapolating results to Asian countries that have not yet been studied. There are also a few adverse consequences of trade that have already been found for Asia. Apart from raising inequality, trade can increase informality, especially in the presence of labor-market rigidities. Additionally, there are the adverse effects stemming from trade adjustment as a result of worker mobility costs. In this context, this study discusses various policies that researchers have recommended. WORKING PAPER NO: 913 |
URL | 查看原文 |
来源平台 | Asian Development Bank |
文献类型 | 科技报告 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/236800 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | [unavailable]. Responses to Trade Opening: Evidence and Lessons from Asia,2019. |
条目包含的文件 | 下载所有文件 | |||||
文件名称/大小 | 文献类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
adbi-wp913.pdf(412KB) | 科技报告 | 开放获取 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 下载 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
查看访问统计 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[[unavailable]]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[[unavailable]]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[[unavailable]]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论