Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1126/science.abc7469 |
Tenure and promotion after the pandemic | |
Mala Htun | |
2020-06-05 | |
发表期刊 | Science
![]() |
出版年 | 2020 |
英文摘要 | To compensate for declines in productivity induced by the pandemic, many universities have automatically extended tenure clocks by 1 year ([ 1 ][1]). This move is necessary but not sufficient. Tenure clock extensions disadvantage some groups. For example, in economics, women on longer clocks due to parental leave get tenure at lower rates than men ([ 2 ][2]). Many men use leave to produce articles, whereas women are more likely to care for children. Tenure committees often fail to account for differences in how leave time is spent. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic will produce additional inequalities. Stay-at-home and public safety orders preclude some research, such as human subjects and laboratory work, while creating opportunities for others. Now is the time to develop strategies to mitigate the inequitable effects of the quarantine.
External reviewers and tenure and promotion committees should make three adjustments to the evaluation process. First, they should instruct candidates to pick the 6 best years of their record and require that evaluators and committees assess only the quality and impact of research, teaching, and service from those years, not the total years after completing their Ph.D. (or after attaining tenure, in the case of full professors). Second, evaluators should require a COVID-19 impact statement that explains the research, teaching, and service that candidates were able or unable to do, infrastructural or financial constraints, and obligations including child and elder care. Third, reviewers and committees should consider qualitative and holistic assessments in addition to quantitative evaluations such as number of publications, citations, impact factors, research expenditures, and teaching scores. These indicators could potentially carry even more biases after COVID-19 ([ 3 ][3]–[ 6 ][4]). Let's treat the pandemic as an opportunity to adopt new standards for advancement that are fair to caregivers and people with diverse research agendas.
1. [↵][5]1. L. Scungio
, “Adapting in times of crisis: Navigating tenure clock stoppage,” Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (blog) (2020); |
领域 | 气候变化 ; 资源环境 |
URL | 查看原文 |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/273422 |
专题 | 气候变化 资源环境科学 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Mala Htun. Tenure and promotion after the pandemic[J]. Science,2020. |
APA | Mala Htun.(2020).Tenure and promotion after the pandemic.Science. |
MLA | Mala Htun."Tenure and promotion after the pandemic".Science (2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
查看访问统计 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Mala Htun]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Mala Htun]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Mala Htun]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论