Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1029/2018GL078079 |
Comparing the Performance of the NEEWS Earthquake Early Warning System Against the CWB System During the 6 February 2018 M(w)6.2 Hualien Earthquake | |
Hsu, T. Y.1,2; Lin, P. Y.2; Wang, H. H.2; Chiang, H. W.2; Chang, Y. W.2; Kuo, C. H.2; Lin, C. M.2; Wen, K. L.2,3 | |
2018-06-28 | |
发表期刊 | GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
![]() |
ISSN | 0094-8276 |
EISSN | 1944-8007 |
出版年 | 2018 |
卷号 | 45期号:12页码:6001-6007 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Taiwan |
英文摘要 | The National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taiwan, has developed an Earthquake Early Warning System (NEEWS). The NEEWS predicts peak ground acceleration (PGA) using an on-site approach, whereas the Central Weather Bureau (CWB), Taiwan, uses a regional approach. Earthquake alerts are issued at the NEEWS stations once PGA reaches a preassigned PGA threshold, regardless of the approach used. An earthquake with a magnitude of 6.2 and a focal depth of 10.0km struck Hualien, in eastern Taiwan, on 6 February 2018. It resulted in 17 fatalities and 285 injuries, 4 collapsed buildings, and damage to more than 175 buildings. During the earthquake, the system performance of 28 NEEWS stations was documented. In this study, we compare and discuss the accuracy of the PGA predictions, lead times, and classification performance of both approaches. Plain Language Summary The National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taiwan, has developed an Earthquake Early Warning System (NEEWS). The NEEWS predicts peak ground acceleration (PGA) using an on-site approach, whereas the Central Weather Bureau (CWB), Taiwan, uses a regional approach. Earthquake alerts are issued at the NEEWS stations once PGA reaches a preassigned PGA threshold, regardless of the approach used. On 6 February 2018, an earthquake with a magnitude of 6.2 and a focal depth of 10.0km struck Hualien, in eastern Taiwan. It resulted in 17 fatalities and 285 injuries, 4 collapsed buildings, and damage to more than 175 buildings. During the earthquake, the system performance of 28 NEEWS stations was documented. In this study, we compare and discuss the accuracy of the PGA predictions, lead times, and classification performance of both approaches. |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000438499100021 |
WOS关键词 | TAIWAN |
WOS类目 | Geosciences, Multidisciplinary |
WOS研究方向 | Geology |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/27940 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
作者单位 | 1.Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Construct Engn, Taipei, Taiwan; 2.Natl Ctr Res Earthquake Engn, Taipei, Taiwan; 3.Natl Cent Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Taoyuan, Taiwan |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Hsu, T. Y.,Lin, P. Y.,Wang, H. H.,et al. Comparing the Performance of the NEEWS Earthquake Early Warning System Against the CWB System During the 6 February 2018 M(w)6.2 Hualien Earthquake[J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS,2018,45(12):6001-6007. |
APA | Hsu, T. Y..,Lin, P. Y..,Wang, H. H..,Chiang, H. W..,Chang, Y. W..,...&Wen, K. L..(2018).Comparing the Performance of the NEEWS Earthquake Early Warning System Against the CWB System During the 6 February 2018 M(w)6.2 Hualien Earthquake.GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS,45(12),6001-6007. |
MLA | Hsu, T. Y.,et al."Comparing the Performance of the NEEWS Earthquake Early Warning System Against the CWB System During the 6 February 2018 M(w)6.2 Hualien Earthquake".GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS 45.12(2018):6001-6007. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论