Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1111/gcb.15219 |
The impact of interventions in the global land and agri‐food sectors on Nature’s Contributions to People and the UN Sustainable Development Goals | |
Pamela McElwee; Katherine Calvin; Donovan Campbell; Francesco Cherubini; Giacomo Grassi; Vladimir Korotkov; Anh Le Hoang; Shuaib Lwasa; Johnson Nkem; Ephraim Nkonya; Nobuko Saigusa; Jean‐; Francois Soussana; Miguel Angel Taboada; Frances Manning; Dorothy Nampanzira; Pete Smith | |
2020-07-07 | |
发表期刊 | Global Change Biology
![]() |
出版年 | 2020 |
英文摘要 | Interlocked challenges of climate change, biodiversity loss, and land degradation require transformative interventions in the land management and food production sectors to reduce carbon emissions, strengthen adaptive capacity, and increase food security. However, deciding which interventions to pursue and understanding their relative co‐benefits with and trade‐offs against different social and environmental goals have been difficult without comparisons across a range of possible actions. This study examined 40 different options, implemented through land management, value chains, or risk management, for their relative impacts across 18 Nature's Contributions to People (NCPs) and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We find that a relatively small number of interventions show positive synergies with both SDGs and NCPs with no significant adverse trade‐offs; these include improved cropland management, improved grazing land management, improved livestock management, agroforestry, integrated water management, increased soil organic carbon content, reduced soil erosion, salinization, and compaction, fire management, reduced landslides and hazards, reduced pollution, reduced post‐harvest losses, improved energy use in food systems, and disaster risk management. Several interventions show potentially significant negative impacts on both SDGs and NCPs; these include bioenergy and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, afforestation, and some risk sharing measures, like commercial crop insurance. Our results demonstrate that a better understanding of co‐benefits and trade‐offs of different policy approaches can help decision‐makers choose the more effective, or at the very minimum, more benign interventions for implementation. |
领域 | 气候变化 ; 资源环境 |
URL | 查看原文 |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/282675 |
专题 | 气候变化 资源环境科学 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Pamela McElwee,Katherine Calvin,Donovan Campbell,等. The impact of interventions in the global land and agri‐food sectors on Nature’s Contributions to People and the UN Sustainable Development Goals[J]. Global Change Biology,2020. |
APA | Pamela McElwee.,Katherine Calvin.,Donovan Campbell.,Francesco Cherubini.,Giacomo Grassi.,...&Pete Smith.(2020).The impact of interventions in the global land and agri‐food sectors on Nature’s Contributions to People and the UN Sustainable Development Goals.Global Change Biology. |
MLA | Pamela McElwee,et al."The impact of interventions in the global land and agri‐food sectors on Nature’s Contributions to People and the UN Sustainable Development Goals".Global Change Biology (2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论