资源环境科技发展态势分析平台

Policy‐makers need reliable future climate projection for adaptation purposes. A clear separation of sources of uncertainty also helps narrow the projection uncertainty. However, it remains unclear for monsoon precipitation projections. Here we quantified the contributions of internal variability, model uncertainty and scenario uncertainty to the ensemble spread of global land monsoon precipitation projections using Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models and single‐model initial‐condition large ensembles (SMILEs). For mean precipitation, model uncertainty (contributing ~90%) dominates the projection uncertainty, while the contribution of internal variability (scenario uncertainty) decreases (increases) with time. The source of uncertainty for extreme precipitation differs from that of mean precipitation mainly in long‐term projection, with the contribution of scenario uncertainty comparable to model uncertainty. Reducing model uncertainty can effectively narrow the monsoon precipitation projection. The internal variability estimates differ slightly among models and methods, the uncertainty partitioning is robust in mid‐long term.