资源环境科技发展态势分析平台

Precipitating versions of the quasigeostrophic (QG) equations are derived systematically, starting from the equations of a cloud-resolving model. The presence of phase changes of water from vapor to liquid and vice versa leads to important differences from the dry QG case. The precipitating QG (PQG) equations, in their simplest form, have two variables to describe the full system: a potential vorticity (PV) variable and a variable M including moisture effects. A PV-and-M inversion allows the determination of all other variables, and it involves an elliptic partial differential equation (PDE) that is nonlinear because of phase changes between saturated and unsaturated regions. An example PV-and-M inversion is provided for an idealized cold-core cyclone with two vertical levels. A key point illustrated by this example is that the phase interface location is unknown a priori from PV and M, and it is discovered as part of the inversion process. Several choices of a moist PV variable are discussed, including subtleties that arise because of phase changes. Boussinesq and anelastic versions of the PQG equations are described, as well as moderate and asymptotically large rainfall speeds. An energy conservation principle suggests that the model has firm physical and mathematical underpinnings. Finally, an asymptotic analysis provides a systematic derivation of the PQG equations, which arise as the limiting dynamics of a moist atmosphere with phase changes, in the limit of rapid rotation and strong stratification in terms of both potential temperature and equivalent potential temperature.