False equivalencies: Online activism from left to right

doi:10.1126/science.abb2428

GSTDTAP > 气候变化

DOI	10.1126/science.abb2428
	False equivalencies: Online activism from left to right
	Deen Freelon; Alice Marwick; Daniel Kreiss
	2020-09-04
发表期刊	Science
出版年	2020
英文摘要	Digital media are critical for contemporary activism—even low-effort “clicktivism” is politically consequential and contributes to offline participation. We argue that in the United States and throughout the industrialized West, left- and right-wing activists use digital and legacy media differently to achieve political goals. Although left-wing actors operate primarily through “hashtag activism” and offline protest, right-wing activists manipulate legacy media, migrate to alternative platforms, and work strategically with partisan media to spread their messages. Although scholarship suggests that the right has embraced strategic disinformation and conspiracy theories more than the left, more research is needed to reveal the magnitude and character of left-wing disinformation. Such ideological asymmetries between left- and right-wing activism hold critical implications for democratic practice, social media governance, and the interdisciplinary study of digital politics.
领域	气候变化 ; 资源环境
URL	查看原文
引用统计
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/293243
专题	气候变化资源环境科学
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Deen Freelon,Alice Marwick,Daniel Kreiss. False equivalencies: Online activism from left to right[J]. Science,2020.
APA	Deen Freelon,Alice Marwick,&Daniel Kreiss.(2020).False equivalencies: Online activism from left to right.Science.
MLA	Deen Freelon,et al."False equivalencies: Online activism from left to right".Science (2020).