Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105257 |
A comparison of variational, ensemble-based, and hybrid data assimilation methods over East Asia for two one-month periods | |
Eun-Gyeong Yang, Hyun Mee Kim | |
2020-09-12 | |
发表期刊 | Atmospheric Research
![]() |
出版年 | 2020 |
英文摘要 | In this study, the performances of variational (three-dimensional variational; 3DVAR), ensemble-based (ensemble Kalman filter; EnKF), and hybrid (E3DVAR) data assimilation (DA) methods based on the Advanced Research Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model are investigated over East Asia for two one-month period of January and July in 2016. Before a comparison between three methods for two one-month periods, a single observation experiment is conducted to tune and optimize background error covariance depending on each method, so that all methods have similar influence radius. For a comparison between three methods for two one-month period by assimilating conventional observations, the E3DVAR outperforms 3DVAR and EnKF for both two seasons. The 3DVAR outperforms EnKF in January, whereas EnKF outperforms 3DVAR in July. The root mean of difference total energy (RM-DTE) for January increases as a forecast time increases, saturating at the value less than 5 m s−1. On the contrary, RM-DTE in July keeps increasing until 72 h forecast time reaching at the value less than 7 m s−1. Relatively larger moisture error in initial condition for summer season can grow rapidly and change large-scale feature considerably, which can contribute to the continuous growth of RM-DTE in July. Furthermore, rank histogram and spread statistics results confirm that ensemble spreads are represented reasonably for January and July in 2016, although spreads in July are slightly overestimated compared to those in January. In conclusion, the hybrid DA method (E3DVAR) is the most appropriate among three DA methods over East Asia. In addition, for the better performance, it is necessary to tune and optimize the DA system depending on DA method for the given area. |
领域 | 地球科学 |
URL | 查看原文 |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/293915 |
专题 | 地球科学 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Eun-Gyeong Yang, Hyun Mee Kim. A comparison of variational, ensemble-based, and hybrid data assimilation methods over East Asia for two one-month periods[J]. Atmospheric Research,2020. |
APA | Eun-Gyeong Yang, Hyun Mee Kim.(2020).A comparison of variational, ensemble-based, and hybrid data assimilation methods over East Asia for two one-month periods.Atmospheric Research. |
MLA | Eun-Gyeong Yang, Hyun Mee Kim."A comparison of variational, ensemble-based, and hybrid data assimilation methods over East Asia for two one-month periods".Atmospheric Research (2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
查看访问统计 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Eun-Gyeong Yang, Hyun Mee Kim]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Eun-Gyeong Yang, Hyun Mee Kim]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Eun-Gyeong Yang, Hyun Mee Kim]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论