Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1007/s10584-018-2288-x |
Clashing interpretations of REDD plus "results" in the Amazon Fund | |
van der Hoff, Richard1,2; Rajao, Raoni2; Leroy, Pieter1 | |
2018-10-01 | |
发表期刊 | CLIMATIC CHANGE
![]() |
ISSN | 0165-0009 |
EISSN | 1573-1480 |
出版年 | 2018 |
卷号 | 150页码:433-445 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Netherlands; Brazil |
英文摘要 | Results-based funding (RBF) is a governance concept that is rapidly becoming the mainstream paradigm for international collaborations in the environmental sector. While portrayed as a compromise solution between market-based mechanisms and unconditional donations, the implementation of RBF is revealing new conflicts and contradictions of its own. This paper explores the application of RBF for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) by describing the discursive conflicts between recipient (i.e., Brazil) and donor (i.e., Norway and Germany) countries of the Amazon Fund about what constitutes results or performance. Although all parties agree that the financial transfers to RBF should be based on past emission reductions in relation to a historical baseline, they hold clashing interpretations about temporal (i.e., past or future) and epistemological (i.e., how to measure) aspects of the results these payments are intended for. Firstly, while Brazil emphasizes that it deserves a reward of USD 21 billion for results achieved between 2006 and 2016, donor countries have indicated an interest in paying only for most recent results as a way to incentivize further reductions. Secondly, while all parties believe that Amazon Fund should support policies to reduce deforestation, donor countries have revealed concerns that the performance of the Amazon Fund projects in generating further reductions has not been measured in a rigorous manner. This suggests that donor countries may consider making changes to current RBF mechanisms or getting involved in new forms of finance. |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000448034000020 |
WOS关键词 | DISCOURSES ; POLICY ; MANAGEMENT ; HEALTH |
WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/29817 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
作者单位 | 1.Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Fac Managementwetenschappen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; 2.Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Lab Gestao Serv Ambientais Lagesa, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | van der Hoff, Richard,Rajao, Raoni,Leroy, Pieter. Clashing interpretations of REDD plus "results" in the Amazon Fund[J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE,2018,150:433-445. |
APA | van der Hoff, Richard,Rajao, Raoni,&Leroy, Pieter.(2018).Clashing interpretations of REDD plus "results" in the Amazon Fund.CLIMATIC CHANGE,150,433-445. |
MLA | van der Hoff, Richard,et al."Clashing interpretations of REDD plus "results" in the Amazon Fund".CLIMATIC CHANGE 150(2018):433-445. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论