GSTDTAP  > 气候变化
DOI10.1007/s10584-018-2288-x
Clashing interpretations of REDD plus "results" in the Amazon Fund
van der Hoff, Richard1,2; Rajao, Raoni2; Leroy, Pieter1
2018-10-01
发表期刊CLIMATIC CHANGE
ISSN0165-0009
EISSN1573-1480
出版年2018
卷号150页码:433-445
文章类型Article
语种英语
国家Netherlands; Brazil
英文摘要

Results-based funding (RBF) is a governance concept that is rapidly becoming the mainstream paradigm for international collaborations in the environmental sector. While portrayed as a compromise solution between market-based mechanisms and unconditional donations, the implementation of RBF is revealing new conflicts and contradictions of its own. This paper explores the application of RBF for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) by describing the discursive conflicts between recipient (i.e., Brazil) and donor (i.e., Norway and Germany) countries of the Amazon Fund about what constitutes results or performance. Although all parties agree that the financial transfers to RBF should be based on past emission reductions in relation to a historical baseline, they hold clashing interpretations about temporal (i.e., past or future) and epistemological (i.e., how to measure) aspects of the results these payments are intended for. Firstly, while Brazil emphasizes that it deserves a reward of USD 21 billion for results achieved between 2006 and 2016, donor countries have indicated an interest in paying only for most recent results as a way to incentivize further reductions. Secondly, while all parties believe that Amazon Fund should support policies to reduce deforestation, donor countries have revealed concerns that the performance of the Amazon Fund projects in generating further reductions has not been measured in a rigorous manner. This suggests that donor countries may consider making changes to current RBF mechanisms or getting involved in new forms of finance.


领域气候变化
收录类别SCI-E ; SSCI
WOS记录号WOS:000448034000020
WOS关键词DISCOURSES ; POLICY ; MANAGEMENT ; HEALTH
WOS类目Environmental Sciences ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WOS研究方向Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/29817
专题气候变化
作者单位1.Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Fac Managementwetenschappen, Nijmegen, Netherlands;
2.Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Lab Gestao Serv Ambientais Lagesa, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
van der Hoff, Richard,Rajao, Raoni,Leroy, Pieter. Clashing interpretations of REDD plus "results" in the Amazon Fund[J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE,2018,150:433-445.
APA van der Hoff, Richard,Rajao, Raoni,&Leroy, Pieter.(2018).Clashing interpretations of REDD plus "results" in the Amazon Fund.CLIMATIC CHANGE,150,433-445.
MLA van der Hoff, Richard,et al."Clashing interpretations of REDD plus "results" in the Amazon Fund".CLIMATIC CHANGE 150(2018):433-445.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[van der Hoff, Richard]的文章
[Rajao, Raoni]的文章
[Leroy, Pieter]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[van der Hoff, Richard]的文章
[Rajao, Raoni]的文章
[Leroy, Pieter]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[van der Hoff, Richard]的文章
[Rajao, Raoni]的文章
[Leroy, Pieter]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。