GSTDTAP  > 气候变化
Future role for voluntary carbon markets in the Paris era
admin
2020-10-23
出版年2020
国家德国
领域气候变化
英文摘要

Executive summary

The end of 2020 marks a fundamental change in the global governance of greenhouse gas emissions with the shift from the Kyoto Protocol era to that of the Paris Agreement. This has important implications for the future role and the feasible models of the voluntary carbon market. In this Executive Summary of our full report – commissioned by the German Emission Trading Authority (DEHSt) at the Federal Environment Agency (UBA) – we analyse a number of options and offer key recommendations on the future role for voluntary carbon markets after 2020. The full report will be published here in the near future.


Main findings:

A critical focus of our analysis is whether and how “double counting” of emission reductions – using the same emission reduction for voluntary offsetting and to achieve a country’s target under the Paris Agreement – is avoided. We show that, where there is a risk that the same emission reduction outcome could be claimed more than once, the impact of voluntary engagement in carbon markets could be negligible, or even lead to an overall negative climate impact.

Within this context it is important that the future design of the voluntary carbon market ensures that the support of activities does not disincentivise governments from increasing their climate mitigation efforts. We apply a number of criteria to assess potential new models for voluntary carbon markets under the Paris Agreement as well as options to increase engagement in voluntary carbon markets and improve transparency.

Three models emerge as potentially viable options in the Paris era: the “contribution claim”, “NDC crediting” and “non-NDC crediting” approaches, each with their own respective strengths and weaknesses. The relative attractiveness of the models is likely to change over time as country NDCs are scaled up.

In order to maximise the climate impact of voluntary market activities and safeguard against some of the risks presented by features of the models, we recommend that the market seeks to focus on project activities representing challenging mitigation options as well as project host countries with ambitious NDC targets.


Contact for further information: Harry Fearnehough, Aki Kachi, Carsten Warnecke, Silke Mooldijk

URL查看原文
来源平台NewClimate Institute for Climate Policy and Global Sustainability
文献类型科技报告
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/300319
专题气候变化
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
admin. Future role for voluntary carbon markets in the Paris era,2020.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[admin]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[admin]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[admin]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。