GSTDTAP  > 气候变化
DOI10.1126/science.abg1730
Data-driven solutions to U.S. polarization
Peter T. Coleman
2021-01-15
发表期刊Science
出版年2021
英文摘要In their Policy Forum “Political sectarianism in America” (30 October 2020, p. [533][1]), E. J. Finkel et al. summarize research on the multiple sources of the decades-long U.S. march to toxic polarization. However, the mitigation tactics they offer seem piecemeal and insufficient. To reverse a 50-year trajectory of runaway division ([ 1 ][2]), we need an evidence-based strategy tailored to structural change. Research on how deeply divided societies change course ([ 2 ][3]) suggests that how leaders approach entrenched problems, especially early on in their tenure ([ 3 ][4]), can make the difference. Transformations are most likely to occur when leaders take office after a major political shock—like the COVID-19 pandemic or the 6 January storming of the Capitol by political extremists—has destabilized the status quo ([ 4 ][5]) and lead in a way that differs dramatically from the leadership that instigated the divisions ([ 5 ][6]). Moreover, in societies where distrust and suspicion reign ([ 6 ][7]), changes in political strategies are often best introduced with a public declaration of intention. The Biden-Harris administration could apply such research by announcing a two-pronged strategy to defeat toxic division in America. First, given that many Americans feel left behind, the new leaders should begin by launching a listening tour during which they partner with local, trusted community groups to elicit grievances and proposed remedies ([ 4 ][5]). Research has shown that when members of disenfranchised groups feel heard by those in power, it can lead to constructive shifts in attitudes ([ 7 ][8]). Large-scale initiatives like these, when transparent and brought to completion, can begin healing ([ 8 ][9]). Second, the new administration should seek to strengthen our national immune system. Research on international peace-building finds that many of the more sustainable initiatives helping communities transition out of intergroup strife come from within ([ 9 ][10]). These local initiatives ([ 8 ][9]) emerge in response to community challenges and manage to thrive under difficult circumstances. Today, there are thousands of bridge-building groups ([ 10 ][11]) across the United States that fit this bill, whose impact could be scaled up through federal funding, recognition, and coordination. They fight against the pathologies of hate and can help citizens build bipartisan alliances that take on the structural incentives that divide us. This is critical. We will never talk our way out of this division ([ 11 ][12]); we must aim for structural change ([ 12 ][13]). 1. [↵][14]Pew Research Center, “Political polarization in the American public” (2014). 2. [↵][15]1. R. R. Vallacher et al ., Attracted to Conflict: Dynamic Foundations of Destructive Social Relations (Springer-Verlag, 2013). 3. [↵][16]1. M. Macy et al ., Sci. Adv. 5, eaax0754 (2019). [OpenUrl][17][FREE Full Text][18] 4. [↵][19]1. C. Gersick , Acad. Manag. Rev. 16, 10.5465/amr.1991.4278988 (1991). 5. [↵][20]1. C. Gersick , J. Change Manag. 20, 7 (2019). [OpenUrl][21] 6. [↵][22]1. S. Lindskold, 2. M. G. Collins , J. Conflict Resol. 22, 679 (1978). [OpenUrl][23] 7. [↵][24]1. E. G. Bruneau, 2. R. R. Saxe , J. Exp. Soc. Psych. 48, 855 (2012). [OpenUrl][25] 8. [↵][26]1. J. Rothman , Ohio State J. Dispute Resol. 22, 105 (2006). [OpenUrl][27] 9. [↵][28]1. A. Munroe , “‘Positive deviants’ point the way in peace-building master's program” (U.S. Institute of Peace, 2013). 10. [↵][29]Morton Deutsch International Center for Cooperation and Conflict Resolution, “Organizations Transforming Polarization & Division” (2020); . 11. [↵][30]1. E. Badger, 2. K. Quealy , “These Americans tried to listen to one another. A year later, here's how they're voting,” The New York Times (2020). 12. [↵][31]1. M. J. Barber , J. Polit. 78, 296 (2016). [OpenUrl][32][CrossRef][33] [1]: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/370/6516/533 [2]: #ref-1 [3]: #ref-2 [4]: #ref-3 [5]: #ref-4 [6]: #ref-5 [7]: #ref-6 [8]: #ref-7 [9]: #ref-8 [10]: #ref-9 [11]: #ref-10 [12]: #ref-11 [13]: #ref-12 [14]: #xref-ref-1-1 "View reference 1 in text" [15]: #xref-ref-2-1 "View reference 2 in text" [16]: #xref-ref-3-1 "View reference 3 in text" [17]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DScience%2BAdvances%26rft.stitle%253DSci%2BAdv%26rft.aulast%253DMacy%26rft.auinit1%253DM.%26rft.volume%253D5%26rft.issue%253D8%26rft.spage%253Deaax0754%26rft.epage%253Deaax0754%26rft.atitle%253DOpinion%2Bcascades%2Band%2Bthe%2Bunpredictability%2Bof%2Bpartisan%2Bpolarization%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1126%252Fsciadv.aax0754%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [18]: /lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6MzoiUERGIjtzOjExOiJqb3VybmFsQ29kZSI7czo4OiJhZHZhbmNlcyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMjoiNS84L2VhYXgwNzU0IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjQ6Ii9zY2kvMzcxLzY1MjYvMjQ1LjEuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9 [19]: #xref-ref-4-1 "View reference 4 in text" [20]: #xref-ref-5-1 "View reference 5 in text" [21]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DJ.%2BChange%2BManag.%26rft.volume%253D20%26rft.spage%253D7%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [22]: #xref-ref-6-1 "View reference 6 in text" [23]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DJ.%2BConflict%2BResol.%26rft.volume%253D22%26rft.spage%253D679%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [24]: #xref-ref-7-1 "View reference 7 in text" [25]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DJ.%2BExp.%2BSoc.%2BPsych.%26rft.volume%253D48%26rft.spage%253D855%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [26]: #xref-ref-8-1 "View reference 8 in text" [27]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DOhio%2BState%2BJ.%2BDispute%2BResol.%26rft.volume%253D22%26rft.spage%253D105%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [28]: #xref-ref-9-1 "View reference 9 in text" [29]: #xref-ref-10-1 "View reference 10 in text" [30]: #xref-ref-11-1 "View reference 11 in text" [31]: #xref-ref-12-1 "View reference 12 in text" [32]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DJ.%2BPolit.%26rft.volume%253D78%26rft.spage%253D296%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1086%252F683453%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [33]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1086/683453&link_type=DOI
领域气候变化 ; 资源环境
URL查看原文
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/311461
专题气候变化
资源环境科学
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Peter T. Coleman. Data-driven solutions to U.S. polarization[J]. Science,2021.
APA Peter T. Coleman.(2021).Data-driven solutions to U.S. polarization.Science.
MLA Peter T. Coleman."Data-driven solutions to U.S. polarization".Science (2021).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Peter T. Coleman]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Peter T. Coleman]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Peter T. Coleman]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。