资源环境科技发展态势分析平台

Net primary productivity (NPP) and net ecosystem production (NEP) are often used interchangeably, as their difference, heterotrophic respiration (soil heterotrophic CO₂ efflux, R_SH=NPP‐NEP), is assumed a near‐fixed fraction of NPP. Here we show, using a rangewide replicated experimental study in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations that R_SH responds differently than NPP to fertilization and drought treatments, leading to the divergent responses of NPP and NEP. Across the natural range of the species, the moderate responses of NPP (+11%) and R_SH (‐7%) to fertilization combined such that NEP increased nearly 3‐fold in ambient control and 43% under drought treatment. A 13% decline in R_SH under drought led to a 26% increase in NEP while NPP was unaltered. Such drought benefit for carbon sequestration was nearly 2‐fold in control, but disappeared under fertilization. Carbon sequestration efficiency, NEP:NPP, varied 2‐fold among sites, and increased up to 3‐fold under both drought and fertilization.