Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
Criminal Justice in the Pandemic Era and Beyond | |
admin | |
2021-09-07 | |
发布年 | 2021 |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | 美国 |
领域 | 资源环境 |
正文(英文) | Even as protesters called for change in cities across America last year, a massive experiment was underway that reshaped every corner of the criminal justice system. Some police agencies scaled back traffic stops and low-level arrests. Courts tried to send more defendants into diversion programs, rather than locking them up. Prisons and jails released people who were awaiting trial or serving minor sentences. The result was a less intrusive, less punitive system of justice—one that dovetailed in some ways with demands for reform, but was brought about more by the demands of COVID-19. The pandemic forced the entire criminal justice system to adapt and innovate in ways it never had before. Researchers convened a series of workshops with experts and practitioners—police chiefs, prison officials, judges, parole officers—to explore how the lessons of COVID-19 could improve the future of criminal justice. The National Institute of Justice sponsored their work. “By showing what was possible,” they wrote, the pandemic “opens up new possibilities for the future.” Here's a small sample of those possibilities, and the questions that must still be answered. PoliceBig ChangeAs courts shut down and jails tried to reduce their populations, some police agencies scaled back low-level arrests and reduced or fully suspended traffic enforcement. Many workshop participants said they had not seen any subsequent increase in crime tied to those changes. ![]() Questions for the FutureDoes evidence support those perceptions that targeted reductions in enforcement had no significant effect on public safety? How would continuing web-based crime reporting, which expanded during the pandemic, affect public trust in police? Are there more effective approaches to respond to mental health crisis calls, which increased during the pandemic? CourtsBig ChangeSome courts closed early in the pandemic and then tried to reduce caseloads when they reopened. That resulted in fewer criminal prosecutions and—in some areas—greater focus on diversion programs and other alternatives. ![]() Questions for the FutureHow did court systems in different states and counties respond to the pandemic, and what did those differences mean for their outcomes? Has the significant reduction in pretrial detention and money bail affected appearance rates? Was the significantly increased use of virtual hearings during the pandemic associated with different outcomes, such as bail amounts or criminal sentences? CorrectionsBig ChangeSome jails, and even some larger prisons, expedited the release of significant numbers of incarcerated people to prevent infection. At the time of the workshops, panelists were optimistic that this “massive natural experiment in decarceration” had not resulted in a major increase in crime. ![]() Questions for the FutureDo crime statistics and other evidence support that view, which could reinforce broader arguments about the need to reduce incarceration in the United States? How can jails and prisons better partner with local hospitals or other health care providers to prepare for the next outbreak of disease? Did virtual visits provide a cheaper and more convenient way for families to stay connected? SupervisionBig ChangeParole and probation officers made greater use of online check-ins to minimize physical contact. Those appear to have been less burdensome and provide better access to services, which could make them a better alternative to usual supervision practices. ![]() Questions for the FutureDid virtual check-ins reduce parole or probation violations and help prevent the backflow of people back into the criminal justice system? How can we best address technological barriers, such as lack of internet WiFi, that could hinder the expansion of virtual supervision? Did the pandemic-related reduction of drug testing and other in-person supervision affect outcomes? |
URL | 查看原文 |
来源平台 | RAND Corporation |
文献类型 | 新闻 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/337278 |
专题 | 资源环境科学 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | admin. Criminal Justice in the Pandemic Era and Beyond. 2021. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
查看访问统计 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[admin]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[admin]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[admin]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论