GSTDTAP  > 资源环境科学
Cost Analysis and Emissions Projections under Power Sector Proposals in Reconciliation
Nicholas Roy; Dallas Burtraw; and Kevin Rennert
2021-10-07
出版年2021
国家美国
领域资源环境
英文摘要

Resources for the Future (RFF) deployed its electricity market model, Haiku, to examine the expected effects on the electricity sector of three policy proposals being considered for the budget reconciliation process: Clean Energy for America Act (CEAA) tax credit extensions, the Clean Electricity Performance Program (CEPP), and a carbon fee. Policy impacts were evaluated in terms of clean electricity generation, emissions reductions, and cost burden on consumers. We find:

  • In 2030, the CEAA tax credit extensions achieve 69 percent clean generation, the CEAA combined with the CEPP achieves 78 percent clean generation, and the CEAA, CEPP, and a central case carbon fee achieve 91 percent clean generation.
  • In 2030, the CEAA and CEPP together achieve 81 percent reduction from 2005 emissions levels in the electricity sector. Adding the central case carbon fee yields a 94 percent reduction.
  • The combination of the CEAA, CEPP, and a central case carbon fee yields a 4.3 percent reduction in nationally averaged retail electricity prices for the 2022-2031 period.

Policy scenario details can be found in the RFF issue brief “Emissions Projections under Alternative Climate Policy Proposals” and general modeling assumptions are detailed in the appendix of the issue brief “Emissions Projections for a Trio of Federal Climate Policies.” The CEAA as modeled includes direct pay to generators but excludes the energy efficiency investments to allow for direct comparison of cost-effectiveness across different supply-side policy investments. The CEAA as written is technology neutral, but Haiku only represents new builds of solar and wind. The CEPP is modeled as a $150 per MWh incentive to new solar and wind generation for the first year of operation and does not include a penalty for not achieving performance targets.[1] We assumed policies are implemented as described without strategic behavior from load serving entities. All policies modeled are exclusive to electricity generation and do not account for economy wide electrification, demand response (consumption is fixed for all policy scenarios), revenue use, or a broader economy-wide carbon fee. All dollar values are reported in 2018 USD and emissions estimates in metric tons. The Haiku model solves over a 30-year time horizon with outputs from 2020 to 2040.

URL查看原文
来源平台Resources for the Future
文献类型科技报告
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/339948
专题资源环境科学
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Nicholas Roy,Dallas Burtraw,and Kevin Rennert. Cost Analysis and Emissions Projections under Power Sector Proposals in Reconciliation,2021.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Nicholas Roy]的文章
[Dallas Burtraw]的文章
[and Kevin Rennert]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Nicholas Roy]的文章
[Dallas Burtraw]的文章
[and Kevin Rennert]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Nicholas Roy]的文章
[Dallas Burtraw]的文章
[and Kevin Rennert]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。