Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/aa63fa |
Benchmarking carbon fluxes of the ISIMIP2a biome models | |
Chang, Jinfeng1,2; Ciais, Philippe1; Wang, Xuhui1,3; Piao, Shilong3; Asrar, Ghassem4; Betts, Richard5; Chevallier, Frederic1; Dury, Marie6; Francois, Louis6; Frieler, Katja7; Ros, Anselmo Garcia Cantu7; Henrot, Alexandra-Jane6; Hickler, Thomas8,9; Ito, Akihiko10; Morfopoulos, Catherine5; Munhoven, Guy11; Nishina, Kazuya10; Ostberg, Sebastian7,12; Pan, Shufen13; Peng, Shushi3; Rafique, Rashid4; Reyer, Christopher7; Roedenbeck, Christian14; Schaphoff, Sibyll7; Steinkamp, Joerg8; Tian, Hanqin13; Viovy, Nicolas1; Yang, Jia13; Zeng, Ning15; Zhao, Fang7 | |
2017-04-01 | |
发表期刊 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
![]() |
ISSN | 1748-9326 |
出版年 | 2017 |
卷号 | 12期号:4 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | France; Peoples R China; USA; England; Belgium; Germany; Japan |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study is to evaluate the eight ISIMIP2a biome models against independent estimates of long-term net carbon fluxes (i.e. Net Biome Productivity, NBP) over terrestrial ecosystems for the recent four decades (1971-2010). We evaluate modeled global NBP against 1) the updated global residual land sink (RLS) plus land use emissions (ELUC) from the Global Carbon Project (GCP), presented as R + L in this study by Le Quere et al (2015), and 2) the land CO2 fluxes from two atmospheric inversion systems: Jena CarboScope s81_v3.8 and CAMS v15r2, referred to as F-Jena and F-CAMS respectively. The model ensemble-mean NBP (that includes seven models with land-use change) is higher than but within the uncertainty of R + L, while the simulated positive NBP trend over the last 30 yr is lower than that from R + L and from the two inversion systems. ISIMIP2a biome models well capture the interannual variation of global net terrestrial ecosystem carbon fluxes. Tropical NBP represents 31 +/- 17% of global total NBP during the past decades, and the year-to-year variation of tropical NBP contributes most of the interannual variation of global NBP. According to the models, increasing Net Primary Productivity (NPP) was the main cause for the generally increasing NBP. Significant global NBP anomalies from the long-term mean between the two phases of El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events are simulated by all models (p < 0.05), which is consistent with the R + L estimate (p = 0.06), also mainly attributed to NPP anomalies, rather than to changes in heterotrophic respiration (Rh). The global NPP and NBP anomalies during ENSO events are dominated by their anomalies in tropical regions impacted by tropical climate variability. Multiple regressions between R + L, FJena and FCAMS interannual variations and tropical climate variations reveal a significant negative response of global net terrestrial ecosystem carbon fluxes to tropical mean annual temperature variation, and a non-significant response to tropical annual precipitation variation. According to the models, tropical precipitation is a more important driver, suggesting that some models do not capture the roles of precipitation and temperature changes adequately. |
英文关键词 | carbon fluxes model evaluation ENSO terrestrial ecosystems climate change interannual variability sensitivity |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000397804200002 |
WOS关键词 | PROGRAM MULTISCALE SYNTHESIS ; ENVIRONMENT SIMULATOR JULES ; WATER-USE EFFICIENCY ; CLIMATE-CHANGE ; INTERANNUAL VARIABILITY ; ATMOSPHERIC CO2 ; GLOBAL CARBON ; INTERCOMPARISON PROJECT ; SEMIARID ECOSYSTEMS ; EL-NINO |
WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/34299 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
作者单位 | 1.CEA CNRS UVSQ, Lab Sci Climat & Environnement, UMR8212, F-91191 Gif Sur Yvette, France; 2.Sorbonne Univ, Univ Paris 06, UPMC, CNRS IRD MNHN,LOCEAN IPSL, 4 Pl Jussieu, F-75005 Paris, France; 3.Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Sino French Inst Earth Syst Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China; 4.Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Joint Global Change Res Inst, College Pk, MD USA; 5.Univ Exeter, Coll Life & Environm Sci, Exeter EX4 4QE, Devon, England; 6.Univ Liege, UR SPHERES, Unit Modelisat Climat & Cycles Biogeochim, Allee 6 Aout 19 C, B-4000 Liege, Belgium; 7.Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany; 8.Senckenberg Biodivers & Climate Res Ctr BiK F, Frankfurt, Germany; 9.Goethe Univ, Dept Phys Geog, Frankfurt, Germany; 10.Natl Inst Environm Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan; 11.Univ Liege, UR SPHERES, Lab Phys Atmospher & Planetaire, B-4000 Liege, Belgium; 12.Humboldt Univ, Dept Geog, D-10099 Berlin, Germany; 13.Auburn Univ, Int Ctr Climate & Global Change Res, Sch Forestry & Wildlife Sci, Auburn, AL 36849 USA; 14.Max Planck Inst Biogeochem, Postfach 10 01 64, D-07701 Jena, Germany; 15.Univ Maryland, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Chang, Jinfeng,Ciais, Philippe,Wang, Xuhui,et al. Benchmarking carbon fluxes of the ISIMIP2a biome models[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS,2017,12(4). |
APA | Chang, Jinfeng.,Ciais, Philippe.,Wang, Xuhui.,Piao, Shilong.,Asrar, Ghassem.,...&Zhao, Fang.(2017).Benchmarking carbon fluxes of the ISIMIP2a biome models.ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS,12(4). |
MLA | Chang, Jinfeng,et al."Benchmarking carbon fluxes of the ISIMIP2a biome models".ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS 12.4(2017). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论