GSTDTAP  > 资源环境科学
DOI10.1289/EHP9649
Charting a Path Forward: Assessing the Science of Chemical Risk Evaluations under the Toxic Substances Control Act in the Context of Recent National Academies Recommendations
Jennifer McPartland; Rachel M. Shaffer; Mary A. Fox; Keeve E. Nachman; Thomas A. Burke; Richard A. Denison
2022-02-23
发表期刊Environmental Health Perspectives
出版年2022
英文摘要

Abstract

Background:

In 2016, Congress enacted the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (“the Lautenberg Act”), which made major revisions to the main U.S. chemical safety law, the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Among other reforms, the Lautenberg Act mandates that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) conduct comprehensive risk evaluations of chemicals in commerce. The U.S. EPA recently finalized the first set of such chemical risk evaluations.

Objectives:

We examine the first 10 TSCA risk evaluations in relation to risk science recommendations from the National Academies to determine consistency with these recommendations and to identify opportunities to improve future TSCA risk evaluations by further implementing these key approaches and methods.

Discussion:

Our review of the first set of TSCA risk evaluations identified substantial deviations from best practices in risk assessment, including overly narrow problem formulations and scopes; insufficient characterization of uncertainty in the evidence; inadequate consideration of population variability; lack of consideration of background exposures, combined exposures, and cumulative risk; divergent approaches to dose–response assessment for carcinogens and noncarcinogens; and a flawed approach to systematic review. We believe these deviations result in underestimation of population exposures and health risks. We are hopeful that the agency can use these insights and have provided suggestions to produce chemical risk evaluations aligned with the intent and requirements of the Lautenberg Act and the best available science to better protect health and the environment—including the health of those most vulnerable to chemical exposures. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP9649

领域资源环境
URL查看原文
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/347134
专题资源环境科学
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Jennifer McPartland,Rachel M. Shaffer,Mary A. Fox,et al. Charting a Path Forward: Assessing the Science of Chemical Risk Evaluations under the Toxic Substances Control Act in the Context of Recent National Academies Recommendations[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives,2022.
APA Jennifer McPartland,Rachel M. Shaffer,Mary A. Fox,Keeve E. Nachman,Thomas A. Burke,&Richard A. Denison.(2022).Charting a Path Forward: Assessing the Science of Chemical Risk Evaluations under the Toxic Substances Control Act in the Context of Recent National Academies Recommendations.Environmental Health Perspectives.
MLA Jennifer McPartland,et al."Charting a Path Forward: Assessing the Science of Chemical Risk Evaluations under the Toxic Substances Control Act in the Context of Recent National Academies Recommendations".Environmental Health Perspectives (2022).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Jennifer McPartland]的文章
[Rachel M. Shaffer]的文章
[Mary A. Fox]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Jennifer McPartland]的文章
[Rachel M. Shaffer]的文章
[Mary A. Fox]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Jennifer McPartland]的文章
[Rachel M. Shaffer]的文章
[Mary A. Fox]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。