Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.09.001 |
Greedy or needy? Land use and climate impacts of food in 2050 under different livestock futures | |
Roos, Elin1; Bajzelj, Bojana2; Smith, Pete3; Patel, Mikaela4; Little, David5; Garnett, Tara6 | |
2017-11-01 | |
发表期刊 | GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
![]() |
ISSN | 0959-3780 |
EISSN | 1872-9495 |
出版年 | 2017 |
卷号 | 47页码:43477 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Sweden; England; Scotland |
英文摘要 | Both supply and demand side changes are necessary to achieve a sustainable food system. However, the weight accorded to these depends on one's view of what the priority goals are for the food system and the extent to which production systems versus consumption patterns are open to change. Some stakeholders see the problem as one of 'not enough food' and focus on the need to sustainably increase supply, while others consider the resource demanding and 'greedy' consumption patterns of the Western world as the main problem and emphasize the need to shift diets. In this study global land use and greenhouse gas emissions are estimated for a set of scenarios, building on four 'livestock futures' reflecting these different perspectives. These scenarios are: further intensification of livestock systems; a transition to plant-based eating; a move towards artificial meat and dairy; and a future in which livestock production is restricted to the use of 'ecological leftovers' i.e. grass from pastures, food waste and food and agricultural byproducts. Two dietary variants for each scenario are modelled: 1) a projected diet following current trends and 2) a healthy diet with more fruits and vegetables and fewer animal products, vegetable oils and sugar. Livestock production in all scenarios (except the baseline scenario) was assumed to intensify to current levels of intensive production in North-Western Europe. For each scenario, several variant assumptions about yield increases and waste reductions were modelled. Results show that without improvements in crop productivity or reductions on today's waste levels available cropland will only suffice if production of all protein currently supplied by animal foods is replaced by (hypothetical) artificial variants not requiring any land. With livestock intensities corresponding to current ones in North-Western Europe and with yield gaps closed by 50% and waste reduced by 50%, available cropland will suffice for all scenarios that include a reduction of animal products and/or a transition to poultry or aquaculture. However, in the scenario based on an extrapolation of current consumption patterns (animal product amounts and types consumed in proportions corresponding to the current average consumption in different world regions) and with livestock production based on feed from cropland, available cropland will not be enough. The scenario that makes use of pastures for ruminant production and food waste for pigs, uses considerably less cropland and could provide 40-56 kg per capita per year of red meat. However, such a livestock future would not reduce GHG emissions from agriculture on current levels. This study confirms previous research that to achieve a sustainable food future, action is needed on all fronts; improved supply and reduced demand and waste. |
英文关键词 | Land use Climate Food Dietary change Mitigation Protein |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000418392300001 |
WOS关键词 | GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS ; DAIRY CONSUMPTION ; CULTURED MEAT ; SECURITY ; SUSTAINABILITY ; MANAGEMENT ; DEMAND ; MITIGATION ; CROPLAND ; WELFARE |
WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies ; Geography |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Geography |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/38020 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
作者单位 | 1.Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Energy & Technol, Lennart Hjelms Vag 9, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden; 2.Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Cambridge, England; 3.Univ Aberdeen, Inst Biol & Environm Sci & ClimateXChange, Aberdeen, Scotland; 4.Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Nutr & Management, Umea, Sweden; 5.Univ Stirling, Inst Aquaculture, Stirling, Scotland; 6.Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Food Climate Res Network, Oxford, England |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Roos, Elin,Bajzelj, Bojana,Smith, Pete,et al. Greedy or needy? Land use and climate impacts of food in 2050 under different livestock futures[J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS,2017,47:43477. |
APA | Roos, Elin,Bajzelj, Bojana,Smith, Pete,Patel, Mikaela,Little, David,&Garnett, Tara.(2017).Greedy or needy? Land use and climate impacts of food in 2050 under different livestock futures.GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS,47,43477. |
MLA | Roos, Elin,et al."Greedy or needy? Land use and climate impacts of food in 2050 under different livestock futures".GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS 47(2017):43477. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论