GSTDTAP  > 气候变化
DOI10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.003
Criteria for effective zero-deforestation commitments
Garrett, R. D.1,2; Levy, S.1,2; Carlson, K. M.3; Gardner, T. A.4; Godar, J.4; Clapp, J.5; Dauvergne, P.6; Heilmayr, R.7; de Waroux, Y. le Polain8,9; Ayre, B.10; Barr, R.11; Dovre, B.10; Gibbs, H. K.12,13; Hall, S.14; Lake, S.10; Milder, J. C.15,16; Rausch, L. L.13; Rivero, R.3; Rueda, X.17; Sarsfield, R.18; Soarer-Filho, B.19; Villoria, N.20
2019
发表期刊GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
ISSN0959-3780
EISSN1872-9495
出版年2019
卷号54页码:135-147
文章类型Article
语种英语
国家USA; Sweden; Canada; England; Colombia; Brazil
英文摘要

Zero-deforestation commitments are a type of voluntary sustainability initiative that companies adopt to signal their intention to reduce or eliminate deforestation associated with commodities that they produce, trade, and/or sell. Because each company defines its own zero-deforestation commitment goals and implementation mechanisms, commitment content varies widely. This creates challenges for the assessment of commitment implementation or effectiveness. Here, we develop criteria to assess the potential effectiveness of zero-deforestation commitments at reducing deforestation within a company supply chain, regionally, and globally. We apply these criteria to evaluate 52 zero-deforestation commitments made by companies identified by Forest 500 as having high deforestation risk. While our assessment indicates that existing commitments converge with several criteria for effectiveness, they fall short in a few key ways. First, they cover just a small share of the global market for deforestation-risk commodities, which means that their global impact is likely to be small. Second, biome-wide implementation is only achieved in the Brazilian Amazon. Outside this region, implementation occurs mainly through certification programs, which are not adopted by all producers and lack third-party near-real time deforestation monitoring. Additionally, around half of all commitments include zero-net deforestation targets and future implementation deadlines, both of which are design elements that may reduce effectiveness. Zero-net targets allow promises of future reforestation to compensate for current forest loss, while future implementation deadlines allow for preemptive clearing. To increase the likelihood that commitments will lead to reduced deforestation across all scales, more companies should adopt zero-gross deforestation targets with immediate implementation deadlines and clear sanction-based implementation mechanisms in biomes with high risk of forest to commodity conversion.


英文关键词Agriculture Forestry Supply chain Conservation Voluntary environmental policies Sustainability standards
领域气候变化
收录类别SCI-E ; SSCI
WOS记录号WOS:000458468400014
WOS关键词LAND-USE CHANGE ; VOLUNTARY ENVIRONMENTAL-PROGRAMS ; MARKET-DRIVEN GOVERNANCE ; RESOLUTION GLOBAL-MAPS ; FOREST DEGRADATION ; AGRICULTURAL LAND ; PALM OIL ; CERTIFICATION ; SOY ; SUSTAINABILITY
WOS类目Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies ; Geography
WOS研究方向Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Geography
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/38343
专题气候变化
作者单位1.Boston Univ, Dept Earth & Environm, Boston, MA 02215 USA;
2.Boston Univ, Global Dev Policy Ctr, Boston, MA 02215 USA;
3.Univ Hawaii, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Management, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA;
4.Stockholm Environm Inst, Stockholm, Sweden;
5.Univ Waterloo, Sch Environm Resources & Sustainabil, Waterloo, ON, Canada;
6.Univ British Columbia, Dept Polit Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada;
7.Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci & Management, Environm Studies Program, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA;
8.McGill Univ, Inst Study Int Dev, Montreal, PQ, Canada;
9.McGill Univ, Dept Geog, Montreal, PQ, Canada;
10.Global Canopy, Oxford, England;
11.N Amer Off Forest Trust TFT, Seattle, WA USA;
12.Univ Wisconsin, Dept Geog, Madison, WI 53706 USA;
13.Univ Wisconsin, Nelson Inst Environm Studies, Madison, WI USA;
14.Natl Advocacy Ctr, Natl Wildlife Federat, Washington, DC USA;
15.Rainforest Alliance, New York, NY USA;
16.Cornell Univ, Dept Nat Resources, Fernow Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA;
17.World Resources Inst, Global Forest Watch, Washington, DC 20006 USA;
18.Univ Los Andes, Sch Management, Bogota, Colombia;
19.Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Ctr Sensoriamento Remoto, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil;
20.Kansas State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Garrett, R. D.,Levy, S.,Carlson, K. M.,et al. Criteria for effective zero-deforestation commitments[J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS,2019,54:135-147.
APA Garrett, R. D..,Levy, S..,Carlson, K. M..,Gardner, T. A..,Godar, J..,...&Villoria, N..(2019).Criteria for effective zero-deforestation commitments.GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS,54,135-147.
MLA Garrett, R. D.,et al."Criteria for effective zero-deforestation commitments".GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS 54(2019):135-147.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Garrett, R. D.]的文章
[Levy, S.]的文章
[Carlson, K. M.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Garrett, R. D.]的文章
[Levy, S.]的文章
[Carlson, K. M.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Garrett, R. D.]的文章
[Levy, S.]的文章
[Carlson, K. M.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。