GSTDTAP

浏览/检索结果: 共5条,第1-5条 帮助

已选(0)清除 条数/页:   排序方式:
Individual differences determine the strength of interactions 期刊论文
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (29) : 17068-17073
作者:  Griffiths, Jason, I;  Childs, Dylan Z.;  Bassar, Ronald D.;  Coulson, Tim;  Reznick, David N.;  Rees, Mark
收藏  |  浏览/下载:11/0  |  提交时间:2020/07/09
size structure  asymmetric competition  Trinidadian guppies  
Overstory trees in excess: A threat to restoration success in Brazilian Atlantic forest 期刊论文
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 449
作者:  Cardoso de Oliveira, Carlos Delano;  Cardoso de Oliveira, Izabela Regina;  Suganuma, Marcio Seiji;  Durigan, Giselda
收藏  |  浏览/下载:5/0  |  提交时间:2019/11/27
Asymmetric competition  Carbon balance  Density  Forest structure  Forest restoration  Natural regeneration  Tree size classes  Understorey  
Linking forest growth with stand structure: Tree size inequality, tree growth or resource partitioning and the asymmetry of competition 期刊论文
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 447: 139-157
作者:  Forrester, David, I
收藏  |  浏览/下载:6/0  |  提交时间:2019/11/27
Asymmetric competition  Climate change  Continuous cover forestry  Growth dominance  Mixed species  Multi-aged  Size heterogeneity  Uneven-aged  
Key drivers of competition and growth partitioning among Robinia pseudoacacia L. trees 期刊论文
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 430: 86-93
作者:  Carl, Christin;  Biber, Peter;  Veste, Maik;  Landgraf, Dirk;  Pretzsch, Hans
收藏  |  浏览/下载:5/0  |  提交时间:2019/04/09
Robinia pseudoacacia L.  Competition  Growth partitioning  Size-growth relationship  Size-asymmetric  Size-symmetric  Phosphorus  Nitrogen  Water  Sunlight  
Development of stand structural heterogeneity and growth dominance in thinned Eucalyptus stands in Brazil 期刊论文
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 384
作者:  Soares, Alvaro A. V.;  Leite, Helio G.;  Cruz, Jovane P.;  Forrester, David I.
收藏  |  浏览/下载:6/0  |  提交时间:2019/04/09
Tree size inequality  Gini'  s coefficient  Growth dominance  Growth partition  Asymmetric competition