Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1007/s00382-019-04960-5 |
On the interpretation of seasonal Southern Africa precipitation prediction skill estimates during Austral summer | |
Hoell, Andrew1; Eischeid, Jon1,2 | |
2019-12-01 | |
发表期刊 | CLIMATE DYNAMICS
![]() |
ISSN | 0930-7575 |
EISSN | 1432-0894 |
出版年 | 2019 |
卷号 | 53期号:11页码:6769-6783 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | USA |
英文摘要 | Differences between two types of prediction skill estimates over Southern Africa are illustrated to better inform the users of seasonal precipitation forecasts over the region who desire assessments of forecast accuracy. Both seasonal precipitation prediction skill estimates for the African continent south of 15 degrees S during the December-March rainy season are derived from the perfect-model method. The perfect-model method is based on a 40-member ensemble of Community Atmosphere Model version 5 simulations forced by observed time-evolving boundary conditions during 1920-2016. The first skill estimate is based on the verification of an ensemble mean forecast spanning many seasons and therefore unconditional on a single boundary forcing. The second skill estimate is based on the verification of an ensemble mean forecast for a single season and is therefore conditional on that year's boundary forcing. Unconditional prediction skill calculated in 30-year increments for each of the 40 possible forecasts reveals: (1) large spread in skill among the individual forecasts for any given year and (2) temporal variations in skill for each forecast. The magnitude of conditional prediction skill varies greatly from 1 year to the next, revealing that the boundary conditions offer little prediction skill during some years and comparably large skill during others. The simultaneous behaviors of the El Nino-Southern Oscillation and the subtropical Indian Ocean Dipole are related to the largest conditional precipitation prediction skill years. Unconditional skill estimates may therefore mislead users of forecasts who desire assessments of forecast accuracy. Unconditional skill may be temporally unstable, and unlike conditional skill, is not representative of the skill for a given season. |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000494681900016 |
WOS关键词 | EL-NINO ; CLIMATE VARIABILITY ; FORECASTING SYSTEM ; RAINFALL ; OSCILLATION ; OCEAN ; SIGNALS ; EVENTS ; WINTER ; MODEL |
WOS类目 | Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/224263 |
专题 | 环境与发展全球科技态势 |
作者单位 | 1.NOAA, Earth Syst Res Lab, Phys Sci Div, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305 USA; 2.Univ Colorado, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Hoell, Andrew,Eischeid, Jon. On the interpretation of seasonal Southern Africa precipitation prediction skill estimates during Austral summer[J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS,2019,53(11):6769-6783. |
APA | Hoell, Andrew,&Eischeid, Jon.(2019).On the interpretation of seasonal Southern Africa precipitation prediction skill estimates during Austral summer.CLIMATE DYNAMICS,53(11),6769-6783. |
MLA | Hoell, Andrew,et al."On the interpretation of seasonal Southern Africa precipitation prediction skill estimates during Austral summer".CLIMATE DYNAMICS 53.11(2019):6769-6783. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
查看访问统计 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Hoell, Andrew]的文章 |
[Eischeid, Jon]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Hoell, Andrew]的文章 |
[Eischeid, Jon]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Hoell, Andrew]的文章 |
[Eischeid, Jon]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论