Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.005 |
Estimating economic impact of black bear damage to western conifers at a landscape scale | |
Taylor, Jimmy D.1; Kline, Kristina N.2; Morzillo, Anita T.3 | |
2019-01-15 | |
发表期刊 | FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
![]() |
ISSN | 0378-1127 |
EISSN | 1872-7042 |
出版年 | 2019 |
卷号 | 432页码:599-606 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | USA |
英文摘要 | Black bear (Ursus americans) damage to trees in the Pacific Northwest is common, although volume and economic losses are unknown. Common measures to quantify bear damage to conifers at large scales rely solely on aerial estimates of red tree crowns (caused by complete girdling) and broad assumptions about stand characteristics. We surveyed 122 vulnerable stands in the Coast Range and western Cascades of Oregon using both aerial surveys and ground surveys. Then, we modeled 4 damage scenarios (Salvage; Total Loss; Root Disease; and Combined Damage) with the Forest Vegetation Simulator (FVS) growth and yield model and the Fuel Reduction Cost Simulator (FRCS). Damage polygons, digitized in real time from aerial surveys identifying red (dead or dying) tree crowns, overestimated bear damage by approximately 5-fold due to misclassification with root disease, and failed to detect partially peeled trees that contributed to economic loss. Damage polygons assessed from the air generally did not include red crowns, and were a mean distance of 58.8 m (SE = 8.8) from damage polygons' outer edges to the nearest red crown. We accounted for mortality and volume losses from partially girdled trees that did not show red crowns in our Salvage scenario, whereas we assumed that all bear-peeled trees resulted in complete loss in the Total Loss scenario. At the landscape scale, economic loss was <= 0.35% of net present value under both damage scenarios, while processing bear damage trees (Salvage) was the most efficacious option. At the landscape scale, our worst-case scenario (Total Loss) resulted in an estimated loss of $56/ha to bear damage, 10-fold less than a previously reported estimate of $585/ha. Root disease was a more prevalent damage agent than bear damage but did not affect net present value at harvest. The majority (92%) of bear damage observed in ground surveys was older ( > 2 yrs) and existed at a low frequency (1.5 bear damaged trees/ha) and severity across the landscape. Our results suggest that black bear damage is not uniformly distributed and that perceived impact varies with spatial scale. On-the-ground monitoring of the status of bear damage across the western Oregon landscape will identify hot spots of severe peeling and provide an under-standing of these changes over time. |
英文关键词 | Black bear Douglas-fir Economic impacts Peeling Pseudotsuga menziesii Timber damage Ursus americans |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000455068700057 |
WOS关键词 | FIR VASCULAR TISSUES |
WOS类目 | Forestry |
WOS研究方向 | Forestry |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/22478 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
作者单位 | 1.USDA APHIS, Wildlife Serv, Natl Wildlife Res Ctr, 321 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA; 2.Oregon State Univ, Dept Forest Ecosyst & Soc, 321 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA; 3.Univ Connecticut, Dept Nat Resources & Environm, 1376 Storrs Rd, Storrs, CT 06269 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Taylor, Jimmy D.,Kline, Kristina N.,Morzillo, Anita T.. Estimating economic impact of black bear damage to western conifers at a landscape scale[J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT,2019,432:599-606. |
APA | Taylor, Jimmy D.,Kline, Kristina N.,&Morzillo, Anita T..(2019).Estimating economic impact of black bear damage to western conifers at a landscape scale.FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT,432,599-606. |
MLA | Taylor, Jimmy D.,et al."Estimating economic impact of black bear damage to western conifers at a landscape scale".FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT 432(2019):599-606. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论