资源环境科技发展态势分析平台

Earth's energy imbalance from human and natural drivers-effective radiative forcing-is difficult to constrain, contributing to uncertainty in long-term climate change. A top-down observational constraint reduces IPCC AR5 assessed uncertainty by nearly 40% and suggests models are biased low.

Radiative forcing is a fundamental quantity for understanding anthropogenic and natural drivers of past and future climate change(1), yet significant uncertainty remains in our quantification of radiative forcing and its model representation(2-4). Here we use instrumental measurements of historical global mean surface temperature change and Earth's total heat uptake, alongside estimates of the Earth's radiative response, to provide a top-down energy budget constraint on historical (1861-1880 to near-present) effective radiative forcing of 2.3 W m(-2) (1.7-3.0W m(-2); 5-95% confidence interval). This represents a near 40% reduction in the 5-95% uncertainty range assessed by the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report(2). Although precise estimates of effective radiative forcing in models do not widely exist, our results suggest that the effective radiative forcing may be too small in as many as one-third of climate models in the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. Improving model representation of radiative forcing should be a priority for modelling centres. This will reduce uncertainties in climate projections that have persisted for decades(4,5).