Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.009 |
Landscape and Urban Planning | |
Weber, Sarah1; Boley, B. Bynum1; Palardy, Nathan1; Gaither, Cassandra Johnson2 | |
2017-11-01 | |
发表期刊 | LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING |
ISSN | 0169-2046 |
EISSN | 1872-6062 |
出版年 | 2017 |
卷号 | 167 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | USA |
英文摘要 | Urban greenways are receiving increased attention due to the implications they have for the sustainable development of 21st century cities. Although preferences of greenway users have been heavily investigated, research on residents' perceptions of living in close proximity to these greenways pales in comparison. With this gap in mind, residents living within two socio-economically different neighborhoods adjacent to the Atlanta BeltLine Trail were surveyed about common neighborhood concerns and how the BeltLine's development alleviates or exacerbates these concerns. By simultaneously asking residents about both neighborhood concerns and the BeltLine's impact on these concerns, modified Importance-Performance (IPA) graphs were created with four quadrants depicting where the BeltLine is successful" and areas where it has aggravated problems. From the 381 responses received, the top five most important neighborhood concerns were crime, property taxes, vandalism, property values, and places for outdoor recreation. The BeltLine was perceived by residents to be improving property values, places for outdoor recreation, and social spaces for gathering, while slightly increasing litter, crime, vandalism, and property taxes. This can be seen on the graphs where most of negatively connoted concerns fell in the "Concentrate here" quadrant with the positively connoted concerns falling in the "Keep up the good work" quadrant. T-test results revealed that the affluent Northside neighborhood viewed the impacts of the trail as more positive than the transitioning Southwest neighborhood. Results suggest that greenway planners should tailor greenway development projects towards individual neighborhoods as they are likely to have different concerns and expectations of urban greenways. |
领域 | 资源环境 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000412959400014 |
WOS关键词 | IMPORTANCE-PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS ; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY ; STREAM CORRIDORS ; GREENWAY SYSTEM ; UNITED-STATES ; RECREATION ; TOURISM ; PERCEPTIONS ; TRAILS ; RESIDENTS |
WOS类目 | Ecology ; Environmental Studies ; Geography ; Geography, Physical ; Regional & Urban Planning ; Urban Studies |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Geography ; Physical Geography ; Public Administration ; Urban Studies |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/25298 |
专题 | 资源环境科学 |
作者单位 | 1.Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Nat Resources Recreat & Tourism, 180 East Green St, Athens, GA 30602 USA; 2.US Forest Serv, USDA, Southern Res Stn, Washington, DC 20250 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Weber, Sarah,Boley, B. Bynum,Palardy, Nathan,et al. Landscape and Urban Planning[J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING,2017,167. |
APA | Weber, Sarah,Boley, B. Bynum,Palardy, Nathan,&Gaither, Cassandra Johnson.(2017).Landscape and Urban Planning.LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING,167. |
MLA | Weber, Sarah,et al."Landscape and Urban Planning".LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING 167(2017). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论