GSTDTAP  > 资源环境科学
DOI10.1029/2020WR028752
Are remote sensing evapotranspiration models reliable across South American ecoregions?
D. C. D. Melo; J. A. A. Anache; V. P. Borges; D. G. Miralles; B. Martens; J. B. Fisher; R. L. B. Nó; brega; A. Moreno; O. M. R. Cabral; T. R. Rodrigues; B. Bezerra; C. M. S. Silva; A. A. Meira Neto; M. S. B. Moura; T. V. Marques; S. Campos; J. S. Nogueira; R. Rosolem; R. Souza; A. C. D. Antonino; D. Holl; M. Galleguillos; J. F. Perez-Quezada; A. Verhoef; L. Kutzbach; J. R. S. Lima; E. S. Souza; M. I. Gassman; C. F. Perez; N. Tonti; G. Posse; D. Rains; P. T. S. Oliveira; E. Wendland
2021-10-13
发表期刊Water Resources Research
出版年2021
英文摘要

Many remote sensing-based evapotranspiration (RSBET) algorithms have been proposed in the past decades and evaluated using flux tower data, mainly over North America and Europe. Model evaluation across South America has been done locally or using only a single algorithm at a time. Here, we provide the first evaluation of multiple RSBET models, at a daily scale, across a wide variety of biomes, climate zones, and land uses in South America. We used meteorological data from 25 flux towers to force four RSBET models: Priestley–Taylor Jet Propulsion Laboratory (PT-JPL), Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM), Penman–Monteith Mu model (PM-MOD), and Penman–Monteith Nagler model (PM-VI). urn:x-wiley:00431397:media:wrcr25611:wrcr25611-math-0001 was predicted satisfactorily by all four models, with correlations consistently higher (urn:x-wiley:00431397:media:wrcr25611:wrcr25611-math-0002) for GLEAM and PT-JPL, and PM-MOD and PM-VI presenting overall better responses in terms of percent bias (urn:x-wiley:00431397:media:wrcr25611:wrcr25611-math-0003%). As for PM-VI, this outcome is expected, given that the model requires calibration with local data. Model skill seems to be unrelated to land-use but instead presented some dependency on biome and climate, with the models producing the best results for wet to moderately wet environments. Our findings show the suitability of individual models for a number of combinations of land cover types, biomes, and climates. At the same time, no model outperformed the other for all conditions, which emphasizes the need for adapting individual algorithms to take into account intrinsic characteristics of climates and ecosystems in South America.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

领域资源环境
URL查看原文
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/339902
专题资源环境科学
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
D. C. D. Melo,J. A. A. Anache,V. P. Borges,et al. Are remote sensing evapotranspiration models reliable across South American ecoregions?[J]. Water Resources Research,2021.
APA D. C. D. Melo.,J. A. A. Anache.,V. P. Borges.,D. G. Miralles.,B. Martens.,...&E. Wendland.(2021).Are remote sensing evapotranspiration models reliable across South American ecoregions?.Water Resources Research.
MLA D. C. D. Melo,et al."Are remote sensing evapotranspiration models reliable across South American ecoregions?".Water Resources Research (2021).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[D. C. D. Melo]的文章
[J. A. A. Anache]的文章
[V. P. Borges]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[D. C. D. Melo]的文章
[J. A. A. Anache]的文章
[V. P. Borges]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[D. C. D. Melo]的文章
[J. A. A. Anache]的文章
[V. P. Borges]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。