Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence

GSTDTAP > 资源环境科学

DOI	10.1016/j.tree.2021.10.009
	Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence
	Stefanie Muff:Erlend B. Nilsen:Robert B. O’Hara:Chloé R. Nater
	2021-11-16
发表期刊	Trends in Ecology & Evolution\
出版年	2021
英文摘要	Despite much criticism, black-or-white null-hypothesis significance testing with an arbitrary P-value cutoff still is the standard way to report scientific findings. One obstacle to progress is likely a lack of knowledge about suitable alternatives. Here, we suggest language of evidence that allows for a more nuanced approach to communicate scientific findings as a simple and intuitive alternative to statistical significance testing. We provide examples for rewriting results sections in research papers accordingly.
领域	资源环境
URL	查看原文
引用统计
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/342045
专题	资源环境科学
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Stefanie Muff:Erlend B. Nilsen:Robert B. O’Hara:Chloé R. Nater. Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution\,2021.
APA	Stefanie Muff:Erlend B. Nilsen:Robert B. O’Hara:Chloé R. Nater.(2021).Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence.Trends in Ecology & Evolution\.
MLA	Stefanie Muff:Erlend B. Nilsen:Robert B. O’Hara:Chloé R. Nater."Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence".Trends in Ecology & Evolution\ (2021).