Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.02.002 |
Building the evidence base for REDD plus : Study design and methods for evaluating the impacts of conservation interventions on local well-being | |
Sills, Erin O.1,2; de Sassi, Claudio2; Jagger, Pamela2,3,4; Lawlor, Kathleen5; Miteva, Daniela A.6; Pattanayak, Subhrendu K.7,8; Sunderlin, William D.2 | |
2017-03-01 | |
发表期刊 | GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
![]() |
ISSN | 0959-3780 |
EISSN | 1872-9495 |
出版年 | 2017 |
卷号 | 43 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | USA; Indonesia |
英文摘要 | Climate change mitigation in developing countries is increasingly expected to generate co-benefits that help meet sustainable development goals. This has been an expectation and a hotly contested issue in REDD+ (reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation) since its inception. While the core purpose of REDD+ is to reduce carbon emissions, its legitimacy and success also depend on its impacts on local well-being. To effectively safeguard against negative impacts, we need to know whether and which well-being outcomes can be attributed to REDD+. Yet, distinguishing the effects of choosing particular locations for REDD+ from the effects of the interventions themselves remains a challenge. The Global Comparative Study (GCS) on REDD+ employed a quasi-experimental before-after-control-intervention (BACI) study design to address this challenge and evaluate the impacts of 16 REDD+ pilots across the tropics. We find that the GCS approach allows identification of control groups that represent the counterfactual, thereby permitting attribution of outcomes to REDD+. The GCS experience belies many of the common critiques of the BACI design, especially concerns about collecting baseline data on control groups. Our findings encourage and validate the early planning and up-front investments required to evaluate the local impacts of global climate change mitigation efforts with confidence. The stakes are high, both for the global environment and for local populations directly affected by those efforts. The standards for evidence should be concomitantly high. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
英文关键词 | Climate change mitigation Conservation and development Impact evaluation REDD Well-being |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000398868900014 |
WOS关键词 | FOREST DEGRADATION ; RURAL LIVELIHOODS ; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ; REDUCING EMISSIONS ; CO-BENEFITS ; DEFORESTATION ; SAFEGUARDS ; POLICY ; PERFORMANCE ; ESTIMATORS |
WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies ; Geography |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Geography |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/38014 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
作者单位 | 1.North Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA; 2.Ctr Int Forestry Res, Bogor 16000, Indonesia; 3.Univ N Carolina, Dept Publ Policy, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA; 4.Univ N Carolina, Carolina Populat Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA; 5.Univ N Carolina, Dept Econ, Asheville, NC 28804 USA; 6.Ohio State Univ, Dept Agr Environm Dev Econ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA; 7.Duke Univ, Sanford Sch Publ Policy, Durham, NC 27708 USA; 8.Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC 27708 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Sills, Erin O.,de Sassi, Claudio,Jagger, Pamela,et al. Building the evidence base for REDD plus : Study design and methods for evaluating the impacts of conservation interventions on local well-being[J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS,2017,43. |
APA | Sills, Erin O..,de Sassi, Claudio.,Jagger, Pamela.,Lawlor, Kathleen.,Miteva, Daniela A..,...&Sunderlin, William D..(2017).Building the evidence base for REDD plus : Study design and methods for evaluating the impacts of conservation interventions on local well-being.GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS,43. |
MLA | Sills, Erin O.,et al."Building the evidence base for REDD plus : Study design and methods for evaluating the impacts of conservation interventions on local well-being".GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS 43(2017). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论