GSTDTAP

浏览/检索结果: 共10条,第1-10条 帮助

限定条件        
已选(0)清除 条数/页:   排序方式:
Want to Rebuild Public Trust? Focus on Civic Education 新闻
来源平台:RAND Corporation. 发布日期:2020
作者:  admin
收藏  |  浏览/下载:31/0  |  提交时间:2020/12/22
How to better understand what makes a virus win during transmission? 新闻
来源平台:EurekAlert. 发布日期:2020
作者:  admin
收藏  |  浏览/下载:0/0  |  提交时间:2020/09/28
Reusing Chicken Litter Shows Benefits 新闻
来源平台:Science Daily. 发布日期:2020
作者:  admin
收藏  |  浏览/下载:2/0  |  提交时间:2020/06/11
Supercomputer model simulations reveal cause of Neanderthal extinction 新闻
来源平台:EurekAlert. 发布日期:2020
作者:  admin
收藏  |  浏览/下载:2/0  |  提交时间:2020/05/22
Leave No One Behind: Using a Benefit-Based Advance Market Commitment to Incentivise Development and Global Supply of COVID-19 Vaccines 新闻
来源平台:Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum. 发布日期:2020
作者:  admin
收藏  |  浏览/下载:2/0  |  提交时间:2020/06/03
Darwin's naturalization conundrum can be explained by spatial scale 期刊论文
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (20) : 10904-10910
作者:  Park, Daniel S.;  Feng, Xiao;  Maitner, Brian S.;  Ernst, Kacey C.;  Enquist, Brian J.
收藏  |  浏览/下载:16/0  |  提交时间:2020/05/13
biological invasions  competition  Darwin'  s naturalization hypothesis  environmental filtering  spatial resolution  
An experimental test of the area-heterogeneity tradeoff 期刊论文
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (9) : 4815-4822
作者:  Ben-Hur, Eyal;  Kadmon, Ronen
收藏  |  浏览/下载:6/0  |  提交时间:2020/05/13
species richness  ecological drift hypothesis  habitat heterogeneity  mesocosm experiment  metacommunity ecology  
EU carbon market state aid rules moving in the right direction – but not far enough 新闻
来源平台:Carbon Market Watch. 发布日期:2020
作者:  admin
收藏  |  浏览/下载:5/0  |  提交时间:2020/06/11
Imperfect detection alters the outcome of management strategies for protected areas 期刊论文
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2020, 23 (4) : 682-691
作者:  Hammill, Edd;  Clements, Christopher F.
收藏  |  浏览/下载:6/0  |  提交时间:2020/07/02
experiments  FLOMS  predators  protected area design  protected areas  SLOSS  
Bacterial coexistence driven by motility and spatial competition 期刊论文
NATURE, 2020, 578 (7796) : 588-+
作者:  Micke, P.;  Leopold, T.;  King, S. A.;  Benkler, E.;  Spiess, L. J.;  Schmoeger, L.;  Schwarz, M.;  Crespo Lopez-Urrutia, J. R.;  Schmidt, P. O.
收藏  |  浏览/下载:8/0  |  提交时间:2020/07/03

Elucidating elementary mechanisms that underlie bacterial diversity is central to ecology(1,2) and microbiome research(3). Bacteria are known to coexist by metabolic specialization(4), cooperation(5) and cyclic warfare(6-8). Many species are also motile(9), which is studied in terms of mechanism(10,11), benefit(12,13), strategy(14,15), evolution(16,17) and ecology(18,19). Indeed, bacteria often compete for nutrient patches that become available periodically or by random disturbances(2,20,21). However, the role of bacterial motility in coexistence remains unexplored experimentally. Here we show that-for mixed bacterial populations that colonize nutrient patches-either population outcompetes the other when low in relative abundance. This inversion of the competitive hierarchy is caused by active segregation and spatial exclusion within the patch: a small fast-moving population can outcompete a large fast-growing population by impeding its migration into the patch, while a small fast-growing population can outcompete a large fast-moving population by expelling it from the initial contact area. The resulting spatial segregation is lost for weak growth-migration trade-offs and a lack of virgin space, but is robust to population ratio, density and chemotactic ability, and is observed in both laboratory and wild strains. These findings show that motility differences and their trade-offs with growth are sufficient to promote diversity, and suggest previously undescribed roles for motility in niche formation and collective expulsion-containment strategies beyond individual search and survival.


In mixed bacterial populations that colonize nutrient patches, a growth-migration trade-off can lead to spatial exclusion that provides an advantage to populations that become rare, thereby stabilizing the community.